Cambridge

A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct

编码说明CODING NOTEBy default, using unacknowledged AI content as one's own work in summative assessment counts as misconduct, unless the assessment brief states otherwise.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）5 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief

编码说明CODING NOTEThe assessment brief may explicitly permit what would otherwise default to misconduct, so the assignment-level rule can override the general position.

52 校中 12 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）12 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct

编码说明CODING NOTEAI-generated content used in summative assessment must be acknowledged; failing to do so is treated as misconduct.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct

编码说明CODING NOTEPassing off unacknowledged AI content as one's own work is classified as academic misconduct.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

benefiting from the educational experience as intended

编码说明CODING NOTERecommends discussing AI use with a supervisor so students still benefit from the intended educational experience.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：明确以学习目标为据（22/37）15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)