Emory

Using AI without instructor permission may also constitute unauthorized assistance or violate other Honor Code provisions.

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructor permission is the gate; use without it is cast as unauthorized assistance or another Honor Code breach.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

The Emory Writing Program generally prohibits using GenAI to complete coursework, except where the instructor explicitly assigns its use for analysis, critical reflection, or a stated learning outcome.

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructors set course rules, but the Writing Program keeps a prohibition floor and exceptions must be explicitly assigned.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

Where AI is permitted, the guidance recommends that students submit the original AI-generated work and show how they edited or adapted it.

编码说明CODING NOTEOnly a recommendation, and only for the permitted case; the file never uses citation or acknowledgement language.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）11 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

Where AI is permitted, the guidance recommends that students submit the original AI-generated work and show how they edited or adapted it.

编码说明CODING NOTESubmitting the original AI output and showing the edits is recommended, not required.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：建议留证（18/19）18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

Emory identifies academic integrity, ethics, access, and bias as central concerns.

编码说明CODING NOTEBias is named among central concerns only; no stated duty to check accuracy, sources, or fabricated citations.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：须自行核实（17/38）11 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

Using an artificial intelligence program to generate any content for any assignment in this course (including, but not limited to examinations, papers, homework, and creative work) constitutes plagiarism and is a violation of the Honor Code.

编码说明CODING NOTEPlagiarism framing is Honor Council model syllabus language for courses where AI is not allowed; unauthorized assistance is the fallback.

52 校中 13 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）13 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

The policy also tells students not to input instructor-created course materials—including syllabi, readings, assignment sheets, prompts, slides, or worksheets—into commercial GenAI platforms.

编码说明CODING NOTEA named category is barred: instructor-created course materials may not be entered into commercial GenAI platforms.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：禁止上传受限数据（20/31）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

It treats such uploading as a violation of the instructor’s intellectual-property rights and an Honor Code issue.

编码说明CODING NOTEUploading instructor materials is framed as an intellectual-property violation as well as an integrity matter.

52 校中 25 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：有明确规定（25/25）25 of 52 take this position · most common: Addressed (25/25)

except where the instructor explicitly assigns its use for analysis, critical reflection, or a stated learning outcome.

编码说明CODING NOTEPermitted use is tied to analysis, reflection, or a stated learning outcome, but no explanation of what skills AI must not bypass.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：明确以学习目标为据（22/37）15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)