← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.30 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.30 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

NYU

New York University纽约大学

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 10 / 12 项有明文规定10 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-08-29Accessed 2026-08-29 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

ai.policy.nestudy.cn/NYU

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准：对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Every AI-supplied citation or link should be opened, read, and independently evaluated.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

10 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句，以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深，规定越明确、越具约束力（不代表优劣）；斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时，适用何种规则？When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

默认禁止Prohibited by default主流口径MOST COMMON
Students must check the syllabus and ask the instructor before beginning; permission in one class does not carry into another.

编码说明CODING NOTEStudents are required to consult the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI; permission is per-course and does not transfer.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定？Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

课程规则优先Course rule supersedes
NYU’s central student guidance says every course may have different generative-AI rules. Students must check the syllabus and ask the instructor before beginning

编码说明CODING NOTEPermission is set course by course; central duties are stated unconditionally but never framed as limits on instructors.

52 校中 12 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）12 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架？Is there a graduated permission framework?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent

在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露？为强制还是建议？Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

强制披露Required主流口径MOST COMMON
The central student guidance says that submitting AI-generated content without acknowledgment is plagiarism and advises students to document their process when AI is permitted.

编码说明CODING NOTEAcknowledgment is binding because omitting it is classified as plagiarism; the separate process-documentation duty is only advisory.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史？Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

建议留证Recommended主流口径MOST COMMON
advises students to document their process when AI is permitted

编码说明CODING NOTEProcess documentation and keeping source notes are advised, not required; no specific artifacts (logs, drafts) are named.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：建议留证（18/19）18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时，由谁负责？Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
The central student guidance tells students to verify everything: AI is not a primary source, important factual claims should be corroborated using more than one credible source, and students should keep source notes.

编码说明CODING NOTEStudents are told to verify everything, corroborate key claims across multiple credible sources, and open and evaluate every AI-supplied citation or link.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：须自行核实（17/38）17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性？How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

明确等同抄袭Explicitly plagiarism
The central student guidance says that submitting AI-generated content without acknowledgment is plagiarism

编码说明CODING NOTEUnacknowledged AI-generated content is named as plagiarism; Steinhardt treats unattributed AI work as an academic-integrity concern.

52 校中 13 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）13 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据？Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具？What must not be entered into an AI tool?

禁止上传受限数据Restricted data prohibited主流口径MOST COMMON
Steinhardt specifically warns against submitting student names, NetIDs, N-numbers, or other identifiers to unlicensed third-party services because of FERPA.

编码说明CODING NOTESteinhardt names identifier categories that must not go to unlicensed tools under FERPA; it is school-specific and phrased as a warning.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：禁止上传受限数据（20/31）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具？Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
NYU’s licensed AI services provide stronger account-level protections than public tools; users should prefer institutionally managed services where appropriate.

编码说明CODING NOTENYU licenses AI services with stronger account-level protections; preferring them is recommended, not mandated.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：提供机构版工具（19/24）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据？Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

一般性表述General statement
Submitted work must reflect the student’s own reasoning, voice, and intellectual effort.

编码说明CODING NOTEStates that submitted work must carry the student's own reasoning and effort, without tying rules to specific skills being assessed.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：明确以学习目标为据（22/37）15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

AI 输出内容AI output正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/30-NYU.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述，以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文，中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料，不是宽严等级；未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界（效力见来源）Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

NYU 本科允许 AI 作工具，但最终须真实原创，须遵守与在校生相同的相关实践/标准；称审阅中不使用 AI 检测。Wagner MSPP 仅允许拼写/语法辅助，Tisch Film Production MFA 要求披露，均仅限各研究生项目。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed initial research 2026-09-24; computer-use recheck 2026-09-24–25 (Asia/Shanghai; per-source timestamps below).
  • 格式说明Format note Verbatim English excerpts are separate from Chinese analysis. Earlier blocked responses are retained as historical records; browser screenshots and accessibility text support the retry.
  • 适用范围Scope note 中央本科 How to Apply 的 AI 段落已核验；Wagner MSPP 和 Tisch Film Production MFA 的不同研究生要求单独列出，不外推。
  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai
  • 校内／课程政策原文（范围不同）Original campus/course research (different scope) 30-NYU.md

中文结论 / Findings

  • 中央本科申请页允许将 AI 作为工具，但最终须为 authentic creation；还要求申请者遵守与在校生相同的相关实践/标准。所链接的学生AI规范未在本轮复核，不补推其具体内容，也不把广义许可扩大为逐项用途清单。[S1-Q1][S1-Q2]
  • 该本科页面声明审阅过程中不使用 AI detection technology；这不等于不核验原创性、真实性，也不保证任何 AI 用法都合规。[S1-Q1][S6]
  • Wagner MSPP 的 ESSAYS 折叠栏现已实际展开并读取：AI 仅可辅助拼写和语法，提交文书须完全本人原创，违反要求学校保留撤录权。这是该研究生项目的更窄要求。[S3]
  • Tisch Film Production MFA 原有 AI 披露与不披露后果保留，仅限该项目。[S4]
  • 中央本科 Application Authenticity 正文也已读取；伪造申请信息的后果不能改写成对一切 AI 使用的处罚。[S6]
  • 2021年署名招生建议只支持真实个人表达，不是当季 AI 专项政策。[S2]

Official sources and selected original text

[S1] How to Apply - Undergraduate Admissions

  • 发布单位Publisher New York University Undergraduate Admissions
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.nyu.edu/admissions/undergraduate-admissions/how-to-apply.html
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated
  • 范围／性质Scope / authority undergraduate / official-application-instructions
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-text; accessed 2026-09-24T16:01:57.168525+00:00
  • 日期说明Date note Not stated in the rendered page; browser acquisition time is not a publication date.
  • 浏览器说明Browser note 初次可见人机验证；稍后重新选择同一标签页时已正常载入。助手未点击或解答验证控件。使用浏览器查找定位 AI use in the Application，并对照截图核验两个段落。
  • 早先采集记录Earlier retrieval record preserved in the source JSON retrieval_history; original error snapshots were not overwritten.

[S1-Q1] review-stage AI detection and original-work/student-standard expectations

NYU does not use AI detection technology as part of the review process. We trust that ­applicants are submitting their original work and expect prospective students to uphold the same practices and standards as all NYU students, when incorporating AI in their academic work.

[S1-Q2] AI tool use and authentic final creation

While applicants may utilize AI as a tool during the college application process, their final application submission should be their authentic creation.

[S2] How Am I Unique? Standing Out in a Crowd of Essays

  • 发布单位Publisher Meet NYU; Lisa Mortini, Senior Assistant Director, NYU Abu Dhabi Admissions
  • 官方链接Official URL https://meet.nyu.edu/uncategorized/how-am-i-unique-standing-out-in-a-crowd-of-essays
  • 最终页面地址Final rendered URL https://meet.nyu.edu/uncategorized/how-am-i-unique-standing-out-in-a-crowd-of-essays/
  • 页面日期Page date 2021-10-19
  • 范围／性质Scope / authority undergraduate / official-admissions-advice
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-text; accessed 2026-09-24T15:57:04.434784+00:00
  • 日期说明Date note Rendered byline: Published October 19, 2021; historical admissions advice.
  • 浏览器说明Browser note 招生人员署名与发布日期已从浏览器正文核验。这是历史文书建议，不是 AI 专项政策。
  • 早先采集记录Earlier retrieval record preserved in the source JSON retrieval_history; original error snapshots were not overwritten.

[S2-Q1] authenticity advice

“Being yourself” in the personal statement is not about being perfect. It’s not about pretending to be what others may expect you to be. On the contrary, it’s about recognizing, in the context you’re in, what matters to you and how it informs the way you experience life and interpret the world.

[S3] Master of Science in Public Policy Application Checklist

  • 发布单位Publisher NYU Wagner
  • 官方链接Official URL https://wagner.nyu.edu/admissions/degree-checklist/mspp
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated
  • 范围／性质Scope / authority graduate-MSPP / program-application-policy
  • 采集方式Retrieval partial; accessed 2026-09-24T15:59:35.052405+00:00
  • 日期说明Date note Rendered banner: Now Accepting Applications for Spring & Fall 2027; exact update date not stated.
  • 浏览器说明Browser note 实际点击 ESSAYS 折叠栏并重新观察，文书要求与 AI 限制完整显示；未声称已展开整张清单的所有其他栏。页面横幅为 Spring & Fall 2027。
  • 早先采集记录Earlier retrieval record preserved in the source JSON retrieval_history; original error snapshots were not overwritten.

[S3-Q1] graduate-only AI restriction and admission consequence

We require you to certify that the essays you submit are entirely your own original work. If necessary, use of proper references and quotes is permissible. The use of artificial intelligence tools is only permissible for providing assistance with spelling and grammar. Please be aware that if it is discovered that the submitted essays do not meet this requirement, we retain the right to revoke your admission.

[S4] Portfolio Requirements for MFA in Film Production

[S4-Q1] graduate disclosure and penalties

Any use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology must be disclosed by the applicant in SlideRoom. Failure to disclose use of AI technology will disqualify applicants from admissions consideration and/or expulsion from the program if later discovered.

[S5] Admissions - Silver School of Social Work (Undergraduate)

  • 发布单位Publisher NYU Bulletins / Silver School of Social Work
  • 官方链接Official URL https://bulletins.nyu.edu/undergraduate/social-work/admissions/
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated
  • 范围／性质Scope / authority undergraduate-school-specific / official-admissions-instructions
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-text; accessed 2026-09-24T15:08:59.963211+00:00
  • 日期说明Date note Not stated.

[S5-Q1] undergraduate authenticity

It is your responsibility to ensure that your application information and all supporting documents are truthful and correct. NYU has a strict policy on application authenticity and working with agents or third parties.

[S6] Application Authenticity

  • 发布单位Publisher New York University Undergraduate Admissions
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.nyu.edu/admissions/undergraduate-admissions/how-to-apply/application-authenticity.html
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated
  • 范围／性质Scope / authority undergraduate / official-application-integrity-policy
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-text; accessed 2026-09-24T15:58:14.435967+00:00
  • 日期说明Date note Not stated in the rendered page; browser acquisition time is not a publication date.
  • 浏览器说明Browser note 中央本科真实性页面正常显示；其虚假信息后果不得改写成任何 AI 使用的自动处罚。
  • 早先采集记录Earlier retrieval record preserved in the source JSON retrieval_history; original error snapshots were not overwritten.

[S6-Q1] undergraduate authenticity expectation

It is our expectation that our applicants act in good faith to submit original applications that are truthful and accurate.

[S6-Q2] falsified-information consequence

In the event that a student is found to have applied with any type of falsified information, the student's application, admission, or enrollment status will be revoked.

使用边界（中文解读，非原文）

  • 允许／可用： 本科：可以把AI作为工具，但最终提交须为真实原创，不能据此自行列出更细的许可；Wagner MSPP：仅拼写、语法；Tisch MFA：要求披露不等于无条件授权任何用途。[S1][S3][S4]
  • 禁止／不当： 最终材料仍受本人原创/真实性要求约束。Wagner MSPP 明文限定AI为拼写和语法辅助；Tisch MFA 不得隐瞒AI使用；本科虚假信息处分以S6为据，三种要求不混为全校一条禁令。
  • 未说明／未核验： 本科未逐项说明构思、提纲、翻译、润色幅度、短答或补充材料例外、通用披露格式、各工具名单；“不使用AI检测”不等于不核验真实性，也不是不合规使用的保证。

Limitations

  • S1/S2/S3/S6均已通过可见Safari页面取得内容，原405/403/202记录保留为历史；S1初次曾显示人机验证，助手未操作验证控件，后续同一标签页已正常载入。
  • S3只展开并完整核验ESSAYS相关部分，因此来源标partial，其他清单折叠栏未全部展开。
  • S1广义工具许可及审阅阶段检测表述仅按页面范围解释；不把课程指导链接直接变成完整申请许可清单。
  • S3为Wagner MSPP、S4为Tisch Film Production MFA，均属研究生特定项目；不能覆盖中央本科要求，也不能用本科的一般表述豁免项目要求。
  • S2发布日期2021-10-19为历史招生建议；S3横幅为Spring & Fall 2027，并非明示政策更新日。
  • 未说明不等于允许；未登录申请系统、未提交申请、未联系招生办公室。
Search and retry log

以下保留初次搜索结果与本次桌面重试，早先的“受阻”不覆盖后续已成功取得的正文。

  • 检索／操作Query / action site:nyu.edu admissions "AI" "essays"
    • 结果Result 定位Wagner研究生等页面，未泛化为本科规则。
  • 检索／操作Query / action NYU undergraduate admissions artificial intelligence essay policy authenticity
    • 结果Result 发现中央本科How to Apply及真实性线索，实时请求受阻。
  • 检索／操作Query / action site:nyu.edu "undergraduate" "AI" "application essays"
    • 结果Result 找到AI-use索引摘要，405验证页导致正文无法核验。
  • 检索／操作Query / action site:tisch.nyu.edu "artificial intelligence" "application"
    • 结果Result 找到并实时核验Film Production MFA作品集AI披露条款。
  • 检索／操作Query / action "NYU" "application authenticity"
    • 结果Result 核验NYU Bulletins本科真实性段落；其中央Application Authenticity链接也受阻。
  • 检索／操作Query / action Computer-use retry of previously blocked official pages (Safari / Peekaboo, 2026-09-24–25)
    • 结果Result S1: 初次可见人机验证；稍后重新选择同一标签页时已正常载入。助手未点击或解答验证控件。使用浏览器查找定位 AI use in the Application，并对照截图核验两个段落。；S2: 招生人员署名与发布日期已从浏览器正文核验。这是历史文书建议，不是 AI 专项政策。；S3: 实际点击 ESSAYS 折叠栏并重新观察，文书要求与 AI 限制完整显示；未声称已展开整张清单的所有其他栏。页面横幅为 Spring & Fall 2027。；S6: 中央本科真实性页面正常显示；其虚假信息后果不得改写成任何 AI 使用的自动处罚。

官方原文The official text

univ/30-NYU.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮，句末标签注明对应条款，点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-08-29
  • 格式说明Format note Concise, source-grounded summaries from official NYU webpages and official-domain indexed text; navigation removed.
  • 适用范围Scope note “Student Learning with Generative AI” is university-level student guidance, not the complete academic-integrity policy. The Steinhardt page is faculty-facing and school-specific and is included only as a clearly labeled supplement.
  • 采集说明Retrieval note The central student page did not return extractable body text during review; only text exposed through official-domain search indexing was used for claims attributed to it.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison and later high-school adaptation.

Official sources

  1. Student Learning with Generative AI
  2. Academic Integrity and Syllabus Support

Course permission and academic integrity

NYU’s central student guidance says every course may have different generative-AI rules. Students must check the syllabus and ask the instructor before beginning课程规则优先Instructor override; permission in one class does not carry into another.默认规则Default rule

The central student guidance says that submitting AI-generated content without acknowledgment is plagiarism违规定性Integrity framing and advises students to document their process when AI is permitted过程留证Process evidence.披露要求Disclosure Steinhardt’s narrower guidance likewise treats unattributed AI contributions or AI-generated work presented as one’s own as academic-integrity concerns and points students to NYU’s citation resources.

Verification and responsibility

The central student guidance tells students to verify everything: AI is not a primary source, important factual claims should be corroborated using more than one credible source, and students should keep source notes.核实责任Verification duty Every AI-supplied citation or link should be opened, read, and independently evaluated.摘录Excerpt Submitted work must reflect the student’s own reasoning, voice, and intellectual effort.学习理由Learning rationale

Privacy and intellectual property

NYU’s licensed AI services provide stronger account-level protections than public tools; users should prefer institutionally managed services where appropriate.机构工具Institutional tools Steinhardt specifically warns against submitting student names, NetIDs, N-numbers, or other identifiers to unlicensed third-party services because of FERPA.数据与隐私Data & privacy Users should likewise avoid uploading copyrighted or third-party material without permission.知识产权IP & copyright

AI detection

The reviewed NYU-domain pages do not state a university-wide student rule for AI-detector evidence. This source set therefore does not infer that detector output is reliable or sufficient from institutional silence.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点，非该校原文，不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • Re-check AI permission for every course and assignment.
  • Require an AI-use note and, where claims rely on outside information, citations to the original sources rather than merely the chatbot.
  • Open and evaluate every AI-provided link and corroborate important claims.
  • Prefer school-managed accounts and never place student identifiers or records into public tools.
  • Avoid detector-based enforcement; assess drafts, source notes, process evidence, and understanding.