← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.09 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.09 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Northwestern

Northwestern University西北大学

来源层级 · 校级通用Source level · University-wide 6 / 12 项有明文规定6 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-08-21Accessed 2026-08-21 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, the unauthorized use of generative artificial intelligence to create content that is submitted as one's own.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

6 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

等同他人协助Treated as outside help
Allowing another person or resource (including, but not limited to, generative artificial intelligence) to do one's work and submitting that work under one's own name without proper attribution.

编码说明CODING NOTENames GenAI alongside another person as a resource; letting it do your work without proper attribution is cheating, and unauthorized use is plagiarism.

52 校中 7 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)7 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
In particular, it is the student’s responsibility to understand the guidelines set by instructors around the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Such guidelines may vary considerably from course to course and even across assignments within a single course.

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructors set GenAI rules per course and assignment, but the University's academic-integrity standards bind all registered students underneath them.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

强制披露Required主流口径MOST COMMON
Submitting material that in part or whole is not entirely one's own work without attributing those same portions to their correct source.

编码说明CODING NOTEAny material not entirely one's own must be attributed to its source; failure to do so is listed as plagiarism.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

一般性提醒General caution
Never fabricate data, citations, or experimental results. Many professional careers have ended in disgrace, even years after the fabrication first took place.

编码说明CODING NOTEInventing data or citations is barred as fabrication, but the text states no duty to verify AI output and does not mention hallucinations.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)11 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

明确等同抄袭Explicitly plagiarism
Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, the unauthorized use of generative artificial intelligence to create content that is submitted as one's own.

编码说明CODING NOTEUnauthorized GenAI use to create submitted content is named as plagiarism; sanctions can reach failure, suspension or expulsion.

52 校中 13 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)13 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 28 所同样未作表述28 of 52 are likewise silent

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

明确以学习目标为据Explicit learning-objective rationale主流口径MOST COMMON
Do your own work. The purpose of assignments is to develop your skills and measure your progress. Letting someone else do your work defeats the purpose of your education, and may lead to serious charges against you.

编码说明CODING NOTERules are justified by assignments existing to build and measure skills; stated for outsourced work generally rather than for GenAI by name.

52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/09-Northwestern.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界(效力见来源)Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

本科招生办公室明确区分建设性与不当 AI 用法:可研究学校、构思文书题目、检查完成稿语法等;不当用法包括代写、翻译文书、将本人提纲交给 AI 写成文书、改写其他学校补充文书。属于官方招生指导,不虚构处罚。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-24 (Asia/Shanghai)
  • 格式说明Format note Short exact English excerpts from live official sources; surrounding Chinese analysis is not quoted university text. Layout/whitespace may differ. Saved readable snapshots retain navigation where present.
  • 适用范围Scope note Official undergraduate applicant guidance; explicitly covers personal statements and supplemental essays. Not a graduate, coursework, or university-wide disciplinary rule.
  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai
  • 校内 AI 指导(范围不同)Original university AI guidance (different scope) ../09-Northwestern.md
  • 用途说明Use note Source comparison, not legal advice or permission to use AI. Application-platform rules, including Common App, are reviewed separately.

中文结论

  • 可用项包括学校/招生术语研究、参访行程、学术方向探索、文书题目构思,以及对完成稿检查语法、标点和拼写。[S1]
  • 校方列为“不当”的用途包括 AI 代写并当作本人文字提交、翻译另一语言写成的文书、将提纲交给 AI 写成完整文书,以及改写一校补充文书给另一校。[S1]
  • 这不是“禁止所有 AI”:完成稿语言检查与文书题目构思有明确正面例子。也不能反向把“可构思题目”扩大为可生成文书正文。[S1]
  • 本页为招生办公室官方指导与明确期待;没有声明一律拒录、撤销录取或使用 AI 检测器。[S1]

Official sources and exact excerpts

[S1] Artificial Intelligence and Admission

  • 发布单位Unit / publisher Northwestern Office of Undergraduate Admission
  • 官方链接Official URL https://admissions.northwestern.edu/apply/advice/ai.html
  • 页面日期Page date 2025-09-23
  • 适用对象Audience / scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority official-advice
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-text; accessed 2026-09-24
  • 核验说明Verification note Page labels uses Constructive / Problematic, states admissions expectations, and links academic integrity policy. No AI-specific admission penalty or detector regime is stated on this page.

[S1-Q1] constructive uses

Constructive Uses of Generative AI These uses can support your research and spark your ideas: Researching colleges and admission terms Building a college tour itinerary (even a virtual college tour itinerary!) Exploring how your academic interests and goals connect to fields of study Brainstorming essay topics Reviewing the grammar, punctuation, and spelling of your completed essays

[S1-Q2] problematic uses

Problematic Uses of Generative AI These uses make understanding your fit for Northwestern difficult for our admissions committee: Using generative AI to write your personal statement or supplemental essays by inputting prompts and submitting the output as your own writing Translating an essay written in another language Providing generative AI with an essay outline and submitting AI’s completed piece of writing Using generative AI to rework a supplemental essay that was written for one school for another school

[S1-Q3] applicant authorship expectation

Just as you wouldn’t ask another person to write your essays for you, we expect you won’t ask AI to do that work on your behalf.

中文解读:允许、禁止与未说明

以下为研究者解读,不是校方原文;不把一般真实性期待写成未发布的 AI 规则。

  • 允许/建设性: 学校与招生信息研究、行程安排、学术方向探索、文书题目头脑风暴、完成稿语法/标点/拼写检查。[S1]
  • 禁止/不当: 原文使用 problematic:生成个人陈述/补充文书并冒充本人写作;AI 翻译文书;让 AI 把提纲写成成稿;AI 改造一校补充文书投另一校。[S1]
  • 未说明: AI 生成提纲本身、短答的单独规则、研究补充材料、AI 使用披露、检测和具体处罚。禁止代写不等于禁止明确列出的语法帮助。

Limits and verification gaps

  • This is official undergraduate admissions advice with explicit expectations; the page does not call every problematic use a formally adjudicated violation or prescribe an automatic rejection/rescission penalty.
  • The translation example concerns an essay written in another language; do not extend it to required translations of transcripts or official documents.
  • The outline example prohibits providing an outline and submitting AI’s completed writing. It does not separately settle whether asking AI for an outline is allowed.
  • No explicit research-supplement AI rule, standalone short-answer rule, disclosure format, detector policy, or penalty is specified here.
  • A link to the university academic-integrity policy does not itself import every enrolled-student course rule into admissions.
Search log

Live targeted searches on 2026-09-24; secondary results were used only to locate official evidence.

  1. site.admissions.northwestern.edu artificial intelligence AI application essays
    • Located official Artificial Intelligence and Admission page with explicit applicant-use categories.
  2. site.admissions.northwestern.edu "AI" "grammar" "Translating"
    • Reconfirmed the official page and its translation/grammar distinction; fetched full text and saved a readable snapshot.

No admissions office was contacted. No private application account or anti-bot bypass was used.

官方原文The official text

univ/09-Northwestern.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-08-21
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant text extracted from the official university webpage; navigation and site chrome removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note Provost academic-integrity principles applicable across Northwestern, with programs and instructors responsible for more specific course and assignment rules.
  • 用途说明Use note This is source material for comparison, not a translation or the school’s final high-school policy.

Principles Regarding Academic Integrity


It is each student’s responsibility to be aware of all rules and policies applicable to their program. In particular, it is the student’s responsibility to understand the guidelines set by instructors around the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Such guidelines may vary considerably from course to course and even across assignments within a single course.课程规则优先Instructor override When students have a question regarding the acceptable use of GenAI, they are expected to seek clarification from the instructor.

Basic Standards of Academic Integrity

All students registered for classes at Northwestern must adhere to the University's standards of academic integrity. These standards may be intuitively understood and cannot in any case be listed exhaustively; the following examples represent some basic types of behavior that are unacceptable:

Cheating

  • Using unauthorized notes, study aids, or information on an examination.
  • Allowing another person or resource (including, but not limited to, generative artificial intelligence) to do one's work and submitting that work under one's own name without proper attribution.默认规则Default rule

Plagiarism

  • Submitting material that in part or whole is not entirely one's own work without attributing those same portions to their correct source.披露要求Disclosure
  • Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, the unauthorized use of generative artificial intelligence to create content that is submitted as one's own.违规定性Integrity framing摘录Excerpt

Fabrication

  • Falsifying or inventing any information, data or citation.
  • Presenting data that were not gathered in accordance with standard guidelines defining the appropriate methods for collecting or generating data and failing to include an accurate account of the method by which the data were gathered or collected.

Eight Cardinal Rules of Academic Integrity (selected rules)

  • Acknowledge Your Sources. Whenever you use words or ideas that are not your own when writing a paper, use quotation marks where appropriate and cite your source in a footnote, and back it up at the end with a list of sources consulted.
  • Do your own work. The purpose of assignments is to develop your skills and measure your progress. Letting someone else do your work defeats the purpose of your education, and may lead to serious charges against you.学习理由Learning rationale
  • Never fabricate data, citations, or experimental results. Many professional careers have ended in disgrace, even years after the fabrication first took place.核实责任Verification duty
  • Always tell the truth when discussing your work with your instructor. Any attempt to deceive may destroy the relation of teacher and student.

Sanctions (relevant excerpt)

All proven cases of an academic integrity violation should be penalized as appropriate under the circumstances. Depending on the nature of the offense, a student may be suspended or expelled as a result of a first-time offense. Possible grade sanctions include: no impact on the grade; the requirement to redo the assignment; grading the relevant piece of work with an F or 0; a failing grade for the course.