← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.17 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.17 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

UCLA

University of California, Los Angeles加州大学洛杉矶分校

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 9 / 12 项有明文规定9 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-08-21Accessed 2026-08-21 申请环节 · UC 系统共同规定Admissions · UC system (shared source)

ai.policy.nestudy.cn/UCLA

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准：对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Students may not present AI-generated work as their own without acknowledgement.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

9 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句，以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深，规定越明确、越具约束力（不代表优劣）；斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时，适用何种规则？When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

等同他人协助Treated as outside help
Students may not present AI-generated work as their own without acknowledgement. Misuse constitutes plagiarism under the UCLA Student Conduct Code.

编码说明CODING NOTEPresenting AI work without acknowledgement is plagiarism under the Conduct Code; the file states no separate fallback for a silent syllabus.

52 校中 7 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）7 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定？Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
The resource advises instructors to state their GenAI policy explicitly. A no-use model treats confirmed use of AI writing tools as academic dishonesty.

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructors are advised to set explicit course GenAI policies while the campuswide Conduct Code rule stands; precedence is never stated in the file.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架？Is there a graduated permission framework?

非正式分类Informal categories主流口径MOST COMMON
A no-use model treats confirmed use of AI writing tools as academic dishonesty. A limited-use model requires AI-generated content to be reviewed, edited, and verified for accuracy before submission.

编码说明CODING NOTETwo instructor policy models (no-use, limited-use) are described, but no formal ladder of permission levels.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：非正式分类（15/20）15 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露？为强制还是建议？Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

强制披露Required主流口径MOST COMMON
Students may not present AI-generated work as their own without acknowledgement.

编码说明CODING NOTEAcknowledgement is stated in mandatory terms; the separate tool-naming and citation guidance is phrased as should.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史？Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时，由谁负责？Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
A limited-use model requires AI-generated content to be reviewed, edited, and verified for accuracy before submission.

编码说明CODING NOTEReview, editing, and verification for accuracy are required within the described limited-use course model, not as a standalone campuswide rule.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：须自行核实（17/38）17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性？How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

明确等同抄袭Explicitly plagiarism
Misuse constitutes plagiarism under the UCLA Student Conduct Code.

编码说明CODING NOTEMisuse is labelled plagiarism under the Student Conduct Code; a no-use course model separately calls confirmed use academic dishonesty.

52 校中 13 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）13 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据？Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具？What must not be entered into an AI tool?

禁止上传受限数据Restricted data prohibited主流口径MOST COMMON
Most approved tools are restricted to low-risk data, and users must check each tool’s permitted data classification. Unless explicitly approved in a secure environment, users may not enter:

编码说明CODING NOTENamed barred categories include FERPA student data, health or personnel information, unpublished research/IP, and export-controlled data.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：禁止上传受限数据（20/31）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具？Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

批准工具清单Approved tool list
Most approved tools are restricted to low-risk data, and users must check each tool’s permitted data classification.

编码说明CODING NOTEAn approval regime with per-tool data classifications is referenced, but no specific tool or vendor is named in the file.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：提供机构版工具（19/24）5 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗
理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据？Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 15 所同样未作表述15 of 52 are likewise silent

在图谱中与其他学校对照 ↗Compare with the others in the atlas ↗

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

工具名称Tool name正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/17-UCLA.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述，以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文，中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料，不是宽严等级；未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status UC 系统本科 AI 规则/指导（共同来源）UC system undergraduate AI rules and guidance (a shared source, not a campus policy)

UC 系统申请诚信声明允许 AI 辅助可读性但要求最终内容/文字为本人所有；2026–27 指南允许早期构思/整理。非 UCLA 独有。Anderson MBA 另允许校对但禁止生成/实质改写，仅限研究生项目。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-24 (Asia/Shanghai)
  • 格式说明Format note Short English excerpts from live official webpages/PDFs; whitespace and layout normalized, wording retained. Chinese findings are editorial interpretation, not official quotations. Local text snapshots retain provenance; unavailable pages are explicitly marked.
  • 适用范围Scope note Primary: undergraduate PIQs and international-applicant authenticity. S2 is UC SYSTEM first-year guidance; S3 is UCLA Anderson Full-Time MBA only.
  • 证据状态Evidence status uc-system-ai-guidance — UC-SYSTEM guidance verified; campus undergraduate authenticity-only material plus separately scoped MBA AI policy.
  • 相关校内／课程指导（范围不同）Related university/course guidance (different scope) Original file

中文结论（解读，非原文）

  • UCLA 本科 PIQ 页强调个人声音和具体经历，但没有直接讨论 AI；不能把人工反馈/拼写检查建议自动换成 AI 许可。[S1]
  • 可核验的本科 AI 建议来自 UC 系统 2026–27 指南：早期构思/整理可以获得辅助，最终 PIQ 保留本人作品和声音。作者是 UC 系统，非 UCLA 独有政策。[S2]
  • UCLA 国际本科页要求申请是学生本人的作品，并列出可能的拒收材料、撤销/取消录取或强制退学等后果；此处是一般真实性要求，不是 AI 专项处罚。[S4-Q1]
  • 单独的 Anderson 全日制 MBA FAQ 允许语法、拼写和清晰度编辑，但内容、思想、写作风格必须属于申请者；AI 不应生成、重写或显著改变实质内容。不可外推本科。[S3-Q1]

Official sources and exact excerpts

[S1] Personal Insight Questions | UCLA Undergraduate Admission

  • 发布单位Publishing unit University of California, Los Angeles — Undergraduate Admission
  • 链接URL https://admission.ucla.edu/apply/personal-insight-questions
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated on the retrieved page.
  • 适用对象Audience / scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority official-advice
  • 采集时间Retrieved full-text; 2026-09-24T23:04:32+08:00
  • 范围与核验说明Scope / verification note Campus PIQ advice for first-year and transfer applicants. AI is not mentioned in the retrieved page.

[S1-Q1] Personal voice in PIQs

These questions are about getting to know you better, so be open, reflective, find your individual voice and express it.

[S1-Q2] Human feedback on reader perspective

Input from people you trust — teachers, friends, relatives — can help you get perspective on how your answers affect those who are reading them.

[S1-Q3] Revision advice; not an AI-specific permission

Read your writing to others, and revise for clarity in content and in style. Pay attention to rules of correct grammar and punctuation, and don’t forget to spell check.

[S2] Presenting yourself on the first-year UC application

  • 发布单位Publishing unit University of California — UC Admissions (system-level counselor/applicant guide)
  • 链接URL https://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/counselors/_files/documents/presenting-yourself-on-the-uc-application-first-year.pdf
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated; cover identifies the 2026–27 application cycle.
  • 适用对象Audience / scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority official-advice
  • 采集时间Retrieved full-text; 2026-09-24T23:05:26+08:00
  • 范围与核验说明Scope / verification note SYSTEM authorship, not Berkeley- or UCLA-specific policy. First-year UC application presentation, live PDF page 67. This quotes the current PDF, not longer/older search-index snippets. The full UC Statement of Application Integrity is researched separately by the parent project.

[S2-Q1] UC-system first-year PIQ advice, PDF page 67

Can be a useful tool for brainstorming or organizing your thoughts in the early stages, but your final PIQ responses should be your own work and voice

[S2-Q2] System guide references the required application-integrity statement

All applicants must agree to UC’s Statement of Application Integrity when submitting their UC application!

[S3] FAQ | UCLA Anderson School of Management

  • 发布单位Publishing unit UCLA Anderson School of Management — Full-Time MBA Admissions
  • 链接URL https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/degrees/full-time-mba/admissions/faq
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated on the retrieved page.
  • 适用对象Audience / scope graduate
  • 来源性质Authority policy
  • 采集时间Retrieved full-text; 2026-09-24T23:04:35+08:00
  • 范围与核验说明Scope / verification note Graduate Full-Time MBA FAQ only; not UCLA undergraduate or university-wide admissions policy.

[S3-Q1] Full-Time MBA only: grammar/clarity editing permitted, substance generation/rewriting restricted

Authenticity is essential in your application essays. While AI can assist in refining essays, applicants must ensure their final work represents their originality and creativity. Applicants may use tools to edit and proof their essays for grammar, spelling, and clarity, but the content, ideas, and writing style must be their own. AI should not generate, rewrite, or significantly alter the essay’s substance. The admissions team values genuine, personal reflections that showcase each applicant’s unique voice.

[S4] International Applicants | UCLA Undergraduate Admission

  • 发布单位Publishing unit UCLA Undergraduate Admission — International Applicants
  • 链接URL https://admission.ucla.edu/apply/international-applicants
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated on the retrieved page.
  • 适用对象Audience / scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority policy
  • 采集时间Retrieved full-text; 2026-09-24T23:07:14+08:00
  • 范围与核验说明Scope / verification note Located under Message About Agents and Consultants, addressed to international undergraduate applicants. Authenticity-only provision, not an AI-use list.

[S4-Q1] Authenticity requirement and possible consequences; no AI-specific wording

UCLA expects an application to be the work of the student and any deviation violates University policy which may lead to rejection of application materials, revocation of an admission offer, cancellation of admission, or involuntary withdrawal from the University.

[S5] UC Application FAQ

  • 发布单位Publishing unit UCLA Undergraduate Admission — counselor application FAQ
  • 链接URL https://admission.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/documents/UCLA-Counselor-Admission-FAQ-March-2025_0.pdf
  • 页面日期Page date March 2025
  • 适用对象Audience / scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority official-advice
  • 采集时间Retrieved full-text; 2026-09-24T23:09:05+08:00
  • 范围与核验说明Scope / verification note Historical four-page UC Application FAQ hosted by UCLA. Checked as an admissions FAQ fallback; no AI-specific passage found. Not treated as current AI policy.

No policy quotation: this source is retained only for search-scope or retrieval documentation.

UC 共享系统规则补证（主审整合）

[S6] Statement of Application Integrity

  • Publishing unit: University of California — undergraduate application system
  • Official URL: https://apply.universityofcalifornia.edu/docs/StatementOfIntegrity.pdf
  • Page date: Last updated August 2023（PDF 页末明示；不是 2026 更新）
  • Retrieved: 2026-09-24T15:10:13.275383+00:00; full-text; public PDF actually downloaded
  • Scope / authority: undergraduate-system-wide; system-application-policy
  • 归属说明：这份文件适用于 UC 共享本科申请，不是本校单独制定的 AI 政策。并列保留 2026–27 申请指南，正式诚信声明与指导材料不得混为同一版本。

[S6-Q1]

The personal insight responses should reflect the student’s own ideas and experiences, be independently written by the student and reflect the student’s personal writing style. Students may receive advice on content and editing, including the use of generative artificial intelligence software to assist with readability, but content and final written text must be their own.

[S6-Q2]

UC conducts regular screenings to verify the integrity of the responses, may request authentication of the content or writing as the student’s, and will take action when it is determined that the integrity of the response is compromised.

[S6-Q3]

Students found to have falsified application information will be subject to penalties up to and including denial of admission, withdrawal of an admission offer, registration cancellation, expulsion or revocation of a University of California degree.

中文解读：正式声明允许内容与编辑建议，包括生成式 AI 的可读性辅助；但 PIQ 须体现本人思想、经历和文风，由本人独立写作，内容和最终文字须为本人所有。UC 可要求真实性核验；引文中的处分针对虚假申请信息，不能说成“任何 AI 使用必然受同样处分”。

使用边界（中文解读，不是学校原话）

  • 本科—明确的系统 AI 辅助：早期构思、整理思路，最终 PIQ 保持本人作品和声音。[S2-Q1]
  • 本科—一般本人作品要求：国际申请页面将偏离本人作品要求列为违反政策并可能带来后果；不是 AI 检测即自动处罚。[S4-Q1]
  • 本科—未单独说明：AI 翻译、研究附件、编辑深度、披露/记录以及检测器使用。
  • 仅全日制 MBA：允许工具做语法、拼写、清晰度编辑；AI 不应生成、重写或大幅改变内容实质。[S3-Q1]

限制与未说明事项

  • S2 是 UC 系统作者的 first-year 指南；不得在网站上标成 UCLA 独有 AI 政策。
  • S4 的明确真实性条款位于国际本科申请/代理与顾问栏目，不是独立 AI 政策；后果为 may lead to，不能写成自动拒绝。
  • S1 的人工反馈、修订和拼写检查建议没有明文许可 AI；不以人工许可替代 AI 规则。
  • UCLA 本科 AI 翻译、研究补充材料、深度润色、披露/留档或 AI 检测程序未在这些校园来源逐项说明。
  • 已并列补入 UC 公开申请诚信声明；本人写作、可读性辅助和一般虚假申请后果以该声明为据，不以系统指南简句推导全部后果。
  • Anderson FAQ 仅限 Full-Time MBA，不能用于本科 PIQ、所有研究生或全校申请。
  • 历史 March 2025 FAQ 只作搜索范围记录；来源未说明的发布日期不以版权年份推断。
检索记录（2026-09-24）
  • site:admission.ucla.edu "artificial intelligence" application — 检索本科站点 AI 条款；无可核验的校园本科专门 AI 使用条款命中。
  • site:ucla.edu admissions "ChatGPT" "personal" — 出现 Anderson MBA FAQ 线索，单独划为研究生；排除课程、课堂和法律学生行为规则。
  • site:admission.ucla.edu "personal insight" "own" — 定位并抓取本科 PIQ 页，核验个人声音和人工反馈建议。
  • UCLA undergraduate admission AI essays generative personal insight guidance — 系统 PIQ 规则线索转向 UC 官方 PDF；二手检测/自动拒绝说法未采信。
  • site:admission.universityofcalifornia.edu "AI" "personal insight" — 现场取得 2026–27 UC 系统 PDF 第 67 页；没有使用不同版本的搜索摘要作引文。
  • Direct fallback review: UCLA International Applicants and March 2025 counselor FAQ — 核验国际本科申请本人作品要求及可能后果；PDF FAQ 正文未见 AI 专条。

本页仅报告上述范围内已核验的材料；未找到、未明确说明或抓取失败均不等于允许使用 AI。课程/在校生政策不自动适用于申请者。

官方原文The official text

univ/17-UCLA.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮，句末标签注明对应条款，点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-08-21
  • 格式说明Format note Direct excerpts and concise, source-grounded summaries from official UCLA webpages; navigation removed. Directly quoted wording is retained.
  • 适用范围Scope note The DTS page is campuswide operational and security guidance. The Teaching and Learning Center resource is instructor-facing rather than the Student Conduct Code itself.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison and later high-school adaptation.

AI Use and Recommendation Guide

UCLA supports “the responsible, transparent, ethical, and risk-informing use of generative AI tools” in education, research, and administration.

Data protection

Most approved tools are restricted to low-risk data, and users must check each tool’s permitted data classification.机构工具Institutional tools Unless explicitly approved in a secure environment, users may not enter:数据与隐私Data & privacy

  • FERPA-protected student information, including IDs, grades, and coursework;
  • health or personnel information;
  • “Unpublished research, IP, or grant proposals”;知识产权IP & copyright
  • export-controlled or restricted data; or
  • malicious or harmful prompts.

Academic integrity

“Students may not present AI-generated work as their own without acknowledgement.披露要求Disclosure摘录Excerpt Misuse constitutes plagiarism under the UCLA Student Conduct Code.默认规则Default rule违规定性Integrity framing”

Reflective and responsible use in teaching and learning

The resource advises instructors to state their GenAI policy explicitly. A no-use model treats confirmed use of AI writing tools as academic dishonesty.课程规则优先Instructor override A limited-use model requires AI-generated content to be reviewed, edited, and verified for accuracy before submission.分级许可Tiered scale核实责任Verification duty

When students present a significant amount of minimally edited AI-generated text, the guidance says they should identify the specific tool and follow appropriate citation guidance.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点，非该校原文，不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • Distinguish approved school AI platforms from consumer accounts.
  • Students must acknowledge AI-generated material and cannot present it as their own.
  • Require review, editing, fact-checking, and citation when AI use is permitted.
  • Keep FERPA-like student records, health information, unpublished research, and intellectual property out of unapproved systems.