← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.04 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.04 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Yale

Yale University耶鲁大学

来源层级 · 校级通用Source level · University-wide 7 / 12 项有明文规定7 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-08-21Accessed 2026-08-21 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

We are each responsible for the content of our work product.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

7 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

交由教师决定Instructor decides, no default
Likewise, students are expected to follow their instructors’ guidelines about permitted use of AI for coursework.

编码说明CODING NOTEPermitted use for coursework is defined by each instructor; the text states no university-level fallback for assignments that are silent.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
All students and faculty are expected to know and adhere to their school’s academic integrity policies. Faculty members are expected to provide clear instructions on the permitted use of generative AI tools for academic work and requirements for attribution.

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructors set permitted use and attribution rules, but school academic integrity policies and the university-wide guidelines still apply.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

依课程而定Course dependent
Faculty members are expected to provide clear instructions on the permitted use of generative AI tools for academic work and requirements for attribution.

编码说明CODING NOTEAttribution is expected but its requirements are defined by each faculty member; no university-wide disclosure format is stated.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

学生对成品完全负责Student fully responsible
We are each responsible for the content of our work product. Always review and verify outputs generated by AI tools, especially before publication.

编码说明CODING NOTEFull accountability for the work product rests with the person, paired with a directive to review and verify AI outputs.

52 校中 10 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)10 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

学术不端Academic integrity violation主流口径MOST COMMON
Always follow academic integrity guidelines and institutional standards of conduct. All students and faculty are expected to know and adhere to their school’s academic integrity policies.

编码说明CODING NOTEAI use is placed under academic integrity and conduct standards; the specific definitions and sanctions are left to each school's policies.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

上传即视为公开Upload is public disclosure
Assume all information shared will be made public. Treat all information shared with an AI tool as if it will become public. Do not share information that is personal or sensitive, and be mindful that the information you input into an AI tool may be retained.

编码说明CODING NOTEEverything entered is to be treated as public; a separate guideline also bars confidential, legally restricted, and moderate/high-risk data.

52 校中 2 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:禁止上传受限数据(20/31)2 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 28 所同样未作表述28 of 52 are likewise silent

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 15 所同样未作表述15 of 52 are likewise silent

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/04-Yale.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界(效力见来源)Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

Yale 本科有明确 AI 政策:允许语法/拼写检查及写作开始时的一般建议或选题建议;把 AI 实质内容用于申请视为欺诈,AI 代写个人陈述或其他回答可能导致撤销录取或开除。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-24 (Asia/Shanghai)
  • 格式说明Format note Short, verbatim English excerpts from live official webpages; whitespace and layout may be normalized. Chinese analysis is separate. Saved readable source bodies may retain some menus or comments; URL and retrieval metadata are in research/group1.json, not inserted into source text.
  • 适用范围Scope note Yale undergraduate admissions, including personal statements, other written application responses, and public first-year/transfer supplement instructions. Graduate programs are not covered.
  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai — Yale Office of Undergraduate Admissions publishes an explicit AI Policy with permitted support and prohibited substantive generation.
  • 校内 AI 政策原文Original campus-AI source file 04-Yale.md (separate scope; not an admissions rule).
  • 用途说明Use note 本文件供来源比较与核验,不构成学校新增规定;未说明不代表许可。

关键发现(中文)

  • Yale 本科招生办明确将其 AI 声明标为本校政策:提交 AI 实质内容或输出构成申请欺诈;由文本生成软件写成的个人陈述或其他书面回答可能导致撤销录取或开除。[S1]
  • 同一政策明确允许 AI 检查语法或拼写,以及在写作开始阶段寻求一般建议或选题建议。因此不能把 Yale 写成“全面禁 AI”或“只能拼写检查”。[S1]
  • 补充材料说明允许一年级与转学申请者提交艺术或学术研究材料;STEM 表要求说明合作研究中本人的具体贡献。公开说明页没有另外列出 AI 使用或披露细则,不应凭空补成科研 AI 禁令。[S2]

Official sources

1. [S1] AI Policy

  • 官方来源Official source https://admissions.yale.edu/ai-policy
  • 发布单位Issuing unit Yale Office of Undergraduate Admissions
  • 页面日期Page date not stated
  • 适用范围Scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority kind policy
  • 采集时间Retrieved 2026-09-24T23:06:35+08:00; full-text (ordinary public HTTP request)

[S1-Q1]

As detailed in the above statements, it is Yale’s policy that submitting “the substantive content or output of an artificial intelligence platform, technology, or algorithm” constitutes application fraud. Submitting personal statements or other written application responses composed by text-generating software may result in admission revocation or expulsion.

[S1-Q2]

Using an AI platform to review one’s grammar or spelling, or to seek general advice or topic suggestions at the start of the writing process does not constitute application fraud. Some applicants may find AI tools useful in these ways; others may not.

中文说明:这是 Yale 本科招生办的明确 AI 政策。页面说明其遵循 Common Application 欺诈政策,并使用 “it is Yale’s policy” 作校方表态;许可条款与禁止条款一并保留。may result 表示可能后果,不是每次都自动撤录。

2. [S2] Supplementary Materials

  • 官方来源Official source https://admissions.yale.edu/supplementary
  • 发布单位Issuing unit Yale Office of Undergraduate Admissions
  • 页面日期Page date not stated
  • 适用范围Scope undergraduate (first-year and transfer)
  • 来源性质Authority kind policy
  • 采集时间Retrieved 2026-09-24T23:06:35+08:00; full-text (ordinary public HTTP request)

[S2-Q1]

First-year and transfer applicants may supplement their application with an arts portfolio or academic research.

[S2-Q2]

Complete the STEM Research Supplement form to describe your research and your specific contributions if the work was done in collaboration with others. Use the form to attach a research paper, abstract, or poster. Full research papers are generally the most helpful. You may also use the form to invite a research mentor to submit a letter of recommendation electronically to the admissions office.

中文说明:本科补充材料页面是独立的提交和归属说明,适用于一年级及转学申请。引用保留了合作研究、论文/摘要/海报和导师推荐信的语境;它要求说明个人贡献,但没有在本次公开正文中规定专门的 AI 披露格式。

Permitted / prohibited / not stated(按用途)

  • 明确允许:语法或拼写检查;写作开始时的一般建议、选题建议。[S1]
  • 禁止 / 欺诈边界:AI 实质性内容或输出用于申请;文本生成软件代写个人陈述及其他书面回答。不是一切接触 AI 都禁止。[S1]
  • 未单独说明:翻译、AI 提纲、逐句改写/润色的界线、研究中使用 AI 的具体规则、AI 披露格式、检测方法。不得把一般建议扩展为允许代写。
  • 研究补充材料:公开说明要求交代本人对合作研究的具体贡献;这不是“AI 使用无需披露”的证明。[S2]
  • 可能后果:撤销录取或开除,原文为 may result。[S1]

Research limitations

  • 范围限 Yale 本科招生办,不扩展到 Yale Law、SOM 或其他研究生项目。
  • 没有登录申请者状态门户查看动态 STEM Research Supplement 表,公开页面未说明的事项可能在表内另有要求。
  • 本次查到的 AI 政策及补充材料页未标明发布日期;不能用访问日冒充政策生效日。
  • 第三方声称学校是否检测 AI、是否要求披露等,不作为结论;未说明不意味着许可或无需披露。
Search log
  • 检索日期Research date 2026-09-24, Asia/Shanghai. Search results were leads only; findings above are based on retrieved official body text.
  1. 检索Query site.admissions.yale.edu "artificial intelligence" application
    • 结果Result 找到并全文核验 Yale AI Policy [S1]。
  2. 检索Query site.admissions.yale.edu "AI" "research" supplement
    • 结果Result 第二组专查科研补充材料;取得 Supplementary Materials [S2]。
  3. 检索Query Yale admissions STEM research supplement artificial intelligence disclose AI tools
    • 结果Result 补查 AI 披露与 STEM 补充表;没有获得超出 [S1][S2] 的可核验公开条款。

官方原文The official text

univ/04-Yale.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 来源层级Source level校级通用 —— 中央或教务层级、面向全校学生的政策University-wide — a central or provost-level policy that applies to all students
  • 抽取审计Extraction audit审计通过,无需修正Clean — no corrections needed
  • 官方来源Official sourceProvost
    https://provost.yale.edu/news/guidelines-use-generative-ai-tools
  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-08-21
  • 格式说明Format note Text extracted from the official university webpage; navigation and site chrome removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note Provost guidance addressed to the Yale community; instructors and units still define course- or activity-specific permissions.
  • 用途说明Use note This is source material for comparison, not a translation or the school’s final high-school policy.

Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI Tools


[Summary: The following message provides guidance to all members of the Yale community regarding the responsible use of generative AI.]

Dear Members of the Yale Community,

Publicly available generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Bing, Midjourney, and Bard have garnered tremendous attention in the past year. The field of generative AI is developing rapidly. While its precise impacts are unknown, this technology will transform how we learn, teach, conduct research, and carry out daily tasks. We encourage you to experiment with AI tools. As you explore AI’s potential, please adhere to the following general guidelines, which align with existing university policies and uphold our institutional commitment to safety, security, and academic integrity.

  1. Protect Yale’s confidential information and your own. Do not enter confidential or legally restricted data or any data that Yale’s data classification policy identifies as moderate or high-risk into an AI tool. If you are not sure whether you should share certain data, please review Yale’s data classification policy .
  1. Assume all information shared will be made public. Treat all information shared with an AI tool as if it will become public. Do not share information that is personal or sensitive, and be mindful that the information you input into an AI tool may be retained.数据与隐私Data & privacy
  1. Always follow academic integrity guidelines and institutional standards of conduct. All students and faculty are expected to know and adhere to their school’s academic integrity policies.违规定性Integrity framing Faculty members are expected to provide clear instructions on the permitted use of generative AI tools for academic work and requirements for attribution.披露要求Disclosure课程规则优先Instructor override Likewise, students are expected to follow their instructors’ guidelines about permitted use of AI for coursework.默认规则Default rule
  1. Be alert for bias and inaccuracy. AI-generated responses can be biased, inaccurate, inappropriate, or may contain unauthorized copyrighted information.知识产权IP & copyright We are each responsible for the content of our work product.摘录Excerpt Always review and verify outputs generated by AI tools, especially before publication.核实责任Verification duty
  1. Protect yourself and your credentials. Never share your Yale NetID and password with AI tools, and always be aware of phishing schemes. For information, tips, and toolkits on cybersafe practices, visit Yale’s Cybersecurity website , which also includes information about security policies and standards.
  1. Seek support. The university is working to support procurement practices that coordinate shared interests and minimize institutional risk. If you are considering acquiring an AI product, please conduct an initial review of the tool to ensure that it conforms to institutional security requirements. Use Yale’s purchasing intake portal or contact purchasing.helpdesk@yale.edu .

Generative AI is evolving quickly, as is institutional support for utilizing these tools. For up-to-date recommendations on teaching and learning, please visit the Poorvu Center’s webpage on “AI Guidance.” Detailed AI guidelines for staff are available on Yale’s data governance website .

As a university community dedicated to exchanging ideas, disseminating knowledge, and fostering a climate for breakthrough discoveries, we will embrace technological tools and harness their power for innovation. We must do this safely and responsibly. We thank you for your efforts in adhering to these guidelines.

Sincerely,

Scott A. Strobel Provost

Jack F. Callahan Senior Vice President for Operations

John P. Barden Vice President for Information Technology