Student Guide to Generative AI | Barnard Center for Engaged Pedagogy
Student Guide to Generative AI
Introduction
Hello there! This is the CEP’s student guide to generative AI tools, which accompanies our
Generative AI & the College Classroom resource for faculty. This guide was initially created by Barnard student interns at the CEP. Their aim was to provide students with guidance and critical understanding of generative AI and its impact on academic integrity and scholarship. The
ATLIS team provided extensive feedback on earlier drafts of this guide. The CEP acknowledges all the contributors who provided content and feedback to this guide. For the Academic Year 25-26, the CEP updated the guide to reflect the continuous evolution of Generative AI, specifically for students at Barnard College. Generative AI tools were also used in generating some content in this guide; however, all the content generated by AI was verified and edited.
What is generative AI?
Generative AI is a type of artificial intelligence that creates new content, based on what it has learned from existing content.
Generative AI produces original outputs based on prompts or inputs. Popular examples include chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and tools that compose music or videos. These systems use large language models (LLMs) which are trained on vast datasets to generate human-like responses or creative content. While powerful, generative AI also raises important questions about accuracy, ethics, and responsible use.
The process of learning from existing content is called “training,” and results in the creation of a statistical model. When given a prompt, generative AI uses this statistical model to predict what an expected response might be - and thus generate new content.
At the CEP, we collaborate with ATLIS, the Digital Humanities Center, and the CSC to provide training and consultations to guide faculty and students to use these tools responsibly.
Academic integrity
It is important to note that generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude cannot replace the value of independent thinking or scholarship学习理由Learning rationale.摘录Excerpt Each of your instructors may have their own position on what constitutes academic dishonesty with respect to these tools, but across disciplines, scholars agree that submitting AI-generated content as one’s own—or relying on it without proper attribution—violates principles of academic honesty披露要求Disclosure违规定性Integrity framing.课程规则优先Instructor override
Your instructors may also include participation, group work, and engagement with others as part of your final grade and as a key component of the learning in the course. Relying on generative AI as your sole interlocutor, or as a substitute for human interaction, could also be considered a form of academic dishonesty, if other forms of collaboration are expected. The Center for Engaged Pedagogy encourages you to talk to your professors and ask what their policies are if ever you are unsure.
Additionally, major citation styles (such as MLA and APA) now provide standards for acknowledging AI-generated content, which this resource outlines in detail. Though generative AI can quickly produce responses that seem authoritative, its outputs may be inaccurate or lack depth. Always verify information with credible sources and cultivate the expertise needed to assess AI-generated material critically.核实责任Verification duty
Limitations
Understanding the limitations of Generative AI, particularly language models like ChatGPT, is crucial when using them for learning purposes. AI tools are only as good as the prediction models and training data that they are built from. This means that an AI tool's knowledge is limited to what it was trained on, and an algorithm fed inaccurate training data will produce poor results. The initial training data for ChatGPT was sourced from resources across the internet, consisting of a vast amount of text from websites, articles, books, and other written materials. Additionally, examples of human conversations and dialogues for over 95+ languages were also fed to the learning model. Despite the vast amount of data available, we want to emphasize that there are still limitations to uses of ChatGPT be aware of. At the same time, some of the limitations that are specific to ChatGPT do not apply to other generative AI models. For example, other models can access the internet.
Biases and stereotypes
One significant limitation of generative AI tools is their susceptibility to biases and stereotypes present in the data used to train the model. These machine learning tools pool data from sources within the training data. In many ways, tools like ChatGPT offer a reflection of the prejudices and conscious and unconscious biases of humanity at large. For this reason, anyone using this technology should be aware that generative AI cannot necessarily recognize biases, and thus can amplify inaccuracies and biases as fact without disclosure.
Fake citations
Another serious limitation of ChatGPT, and similar technology, is the fact that it often “hallucinates” or makes up information. There are enormous ethical implications to this, and in the research and writing process, it is crucial that students understand that sources produced by ChatGPT can be entirely made up and not actually correspond to real sources.
Outdated responses
Although the responses of ChatGPT are generated in real-time, they may not always be up to date. The GPT 3.5 model was last trained in September 2021, meaning it may give outdated responses unless its training data is updated (the GPT 4 model, which requires a paid subscription, was last updated in April 2023) . Unlike search engines like Google which can provide the latest information, ChatGPT isn’t trained to search the internet and pull information while being used.
Limited ability to perform calculations
While you may have heard tools like ChatGPT compared to the calculator within the history of technological innovation, ChatGPT is actually not a calculator and cannot perform calculations
. If you ask ChatGPT to calculate something for you, you may notice that it is inconsistent in its responses. This is because it treats all numbers as text or string and is only making an educated guess on the correct answer. If you do ask ChatGPT to provide such an educated guess, we recommend comparing your results with a calculator or a tool designed to calculate equations.
How to effectively use ChatGPT with integrity
As a scholar, when using generative AI tools like ChatGPT, it is important to follow a checklist to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the information you obtain. Since ChatGPT does not provide citations and may formulate answers based on biased data, it is crucial to cross-reference any information obtained from the tool. Additionally, it is essential to analyze the information provided by the AI tool to draw your own conclusions, treating it as an interlocutor rather than as a reliable source of information. To limit the range of possible answers, it is recommended to be specific. If necessary, rephrasing or providing more context can also help ensure that the information obtained is relevant and useful. The more background knowledge you have as a researcher, the better your ability to draw your own conclusions and correctly identify misinformation within the AI generated responses.
General checklist when using generative AI tools
Did I cross-reference the information I’m using?
Does the manner in which I am using this generative AI tool allow for me to still come to my own conclusions?
Did I come to these findings prior to or after using generative AI?
Have I informed myself on the subject matter using other methods prior to using generative AI?
Toolkit for informed exploration
After reading the guide, this section is a resource you can come back to when you have questions about how you are engaging with Generative AI. It features simplified prompts, functions, and scenarios to facilitate informed academic exploration of Generative AI. Its aim is to streamline and make accessible the critical analysis of your interactions with tools like ChatGPT, Bing Copilot, and Bard AI.
While specific examples may refer to ChatGPT, the principles discussed here can be applied to any generative AI tool.
Give instructions not questions
Think of generative AI tools as an interlocutor or brainstorming tool. By providing ChatGPT specific instructions, you get targeted outputs, which is more beneficial than asking it to generate original content.
Example: Can you think of 5 titles for a [subject] paper on [insert context]?
Example: Can you organize these notes [input] into an outline?
Example: Can you create flashcards from these notes [input notes]?
Caution: Providing ChatGPT with one’s own original work can pose privacy concerns since it is a learning machine that takes in input it receives to produce information. While User inputs are not incorporated into the large language model, they are visible to and stored by OpenAI
, and may be used to develop future iterations of the tool.
Asking for prompts
Using Generative AI is an accessible way to get prompts and practice questions tailored to your learning objectives and areas of focus. Try some of these examples to see how it can assist you in preparing for exams or to overcome writer's block!
Example: Can you provide writing prompts about [subject matter]?
Example: Can you provide practice problems for [subject]?
Get specific with your instructions–add a quantity to your request, the genre of your request, or format.
Example: Can you provide 5 creative writing prompts about [subject matter]?
Example: Can you provide 10 multiple choice practice problems for [subject]?
Note: Sometimes ChatGPT will not produce the correct amount of prompts if the quantity asked is too high.
Get both sides of the argument
If you want a general sense of the different opinions on a topic, Generative AI can be useful in categorizing and summing up those perspectives for you.
Example: What are the different perspectives on X
?
Limitation: ChatGPT 3.5 has only been trained on data from up to September 2021, and ChatGPT 4.0 has only been trained on data from up to April2023. If you were to ask it about an event or subject that occurred in recent history, the model may produce an educated guess that could be inaccurate, or it may tell you that it cannot answer the question.
Summarize long articles
Generative AI can condense lengthy texts into concise summaries or bullet points, which can come in handy if you want to get an overview of what an article covers for instance.
Example: Could you summarize this article [Title] by [Author]?
Limitation: Note that when ChatGPT does not have information or enough context for the question or article inquiry, it will make up information and present it as part of the summary. This phenomenon is called “ hallucination
” in AI speak. Always cross-reference work that you use from generative AI.
Note: ChatGPT can’t do this accurately unless you copy + paste the article into the text box or have a plus subscription and use a plugin. Other AI models, however, can do this.
Ask for writing templates
AI-generated templates can be a starting point for common administrative writing tasks (e.g., cover letters), especially since you can request Generative AI to customize it so it fits individual needs.
Example: Can you provide me with a cover letter template?
Example: Can you write an email asking for a letter of recommendation?
Note: These templates can be more helpful the more you specify what you need the template for. It will also be important for you to make substantial edits within these templates to best suit your needs.
Ask for feedback
You can use Generative AI to get preliminary feedback on written work or code, which can be a useful step before peer review.
You can provide ChatGPT with an excerpt of your work or lines of code for it to analyze.
Caution: Providing ChatGPT with original work can pose privacy concerns since it is a learning machine that takes in input it receives to produce information.
Note: Feedback on code is limited by its inability to execute code, so any claim that a particular code will work is a “text-based” prediction.
Use it for language translation
Generative AI offers more nuanced and contextually accurate translations which makes it a more helpful way to quickly translate written text compared to other tools like Google Translate.
People have used ChatGPT in 95+ languages and ChatGPT can often provide scenarios and dialogues to help language learners
.
Example: Can you translate [phrase] in the context of an [event] into [language]?
Can you translate “I am sorry” in the context of a business meeting into Mandarin?
Example: Can you provide me with a sample scenario for [event/action] in [language]?
Can you provide me with a sample scenario for asking for the bill in Spanish?
Note: The scenarios ChatGPT provides may use language that is too formal in tone which might not reflect how current speakers of the language actually communicate with each other.
Note: The program does not work as well with less popular languages, and in any language can make up words. If you’re in a language learning class, it’s likely not appropriate to use ChatGPT this way.
Using GenAI at Barnard | Barnard College
Using GenAI at Barnard
Best Practices
Before using any generative AI tool, please note the following best practices:
Be informed regarding the terms of service of the tool you're using.
Material that you submit may become part of the program’s database—using the software also contributes to its development. The systems have different policies and methods to let you remove your material, so be sure to look for those instructions and to review the Terms of Service.
What rights does the tool owner have to your content (input or output)?
What is the privacy policy? Can anyone see what you've entered or generated?
Be mindful about the prompts you are feeding into your bot. AI tools raise issues of privacy and intellectual property数据与隐私Data & privacy
. We advise caution with the following:
Your own intellectual property (i.e., work you have created and for which you want to protect the copyright), unless you want it to be used to train an LLM, or you are able to disable the settings so that it does not use your work for training.
Student work, as this may be a violation of their intellectual property.
Personal or protected information, such as PII (personally Identifiable Information) or FERPA-protected data (e.g., names, addresses, birthdates, phone numbers).
Copyrighted works of others may be a risk, as the law is unsettled and what constitutes fair use is not clear.知识产权IP & copyright
Even software platforms that don’t use your content to train the product may collect your information or install cookies to track your other activity.
While you may choose to make this bargain to try out AI tools yourself, it can be more problematic to require students to sign up for tools that will track and use their private data.
Be aware that generative AI can make mistakes or provide inaccurate information, called hallucinations.
Critically evaluate the output you're given, and check facts against another source when appropriate. Although a generative AI tool might cite sources, these citations are not always accurate.
Adhere to relevant generative AI policies for the work you're doing.
For students, this means understanding your course AI policy and only using generative AI for academic work when it is allowed by your instructor默认规则Default rule. If you are unsure of the course policy, please clarify with your instructor before proceeding. For faculty and staff, this includes complying with any guidelines or policies from academic publications or professional associations.
Available Tools
Tools Available for the Barnard Community
The below tools are available through our existing partnerships with Google and Adobe.
Tool
Description
Resources
Gemini
Generative AI chatbot from Google, available for FERPA-compliant use with your Barnard gBear credentials机构工具Institutional tools.
Getting Started with Gemini
Notebook LM
Research and note-taking focused AI tool from Google, available for FERPA-compliant use with your Barnard gBear credentials.
Getting Started with NotebookLM
Adobe Firefly
Image generation platform available for faculty and staff through Barnard Adobe accounts. Students can sign up for a free Adobe account that will provide some access to the platform.
Adobe Firefly Resource Hub
Please note that many other academic technology tools at Barnard - such as Padlet and Yellowdig - now incorporate Generative AI features.
ChatGPT Teams Pilot Program
ATLIS has a pilot program for faculty and instructional staff who are interested in access to a ChatGPT Team account. A ChatGPT Team account has the same features as a ChatGPT Pro account - including access to image generation, custom GPT creation, advanced data analysis tools, and advanced voice capabilities - with additional privacy protections for your data. By default, your data will not be shared with OpenAI or used to train future versions of ChatGPT. Because we only have a limited number of accounts available, eligibility is limited: If you would like to participate, please send an email to atlis@barnard.edu and we'll let you know the next steps.
Beyond What's Available at Barnard: Other Generative AI Tools
There's an ever-growing array of both free and paid generative AI tools, from all-purpose chatbots to tools specifically designed to aid with teaching and learning. While our team is familiar with some of these, we unfortunately cannot offer support for every generative AI tool. If you choose to use something that isn't formally supported by Barnard, please be extra careful when thinking through data and privacy protections. If there is a specific tool you're interested in using for a course or research project, please reach out to us at atlis@barnard.edu or request a consultation.
以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.
High-school adaptation takeaways
- 研究者建议(非校方新增规则):高中课程逐项明确AI使用范围与披露方式;本人负责思考和核验;谨慎处理隐私及第三方作品。此建议不适用于推定该校本科招生许可。