← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.36 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.36 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Wellesley

Wellesley College韦尔斯利学院

来源层级 · 院系或项目级Source level · Unit or school 4 / 12 项有明文规定4 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 未取得可核实指导Admissions · No verifiable guidance

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Always check a source yourself to make it less likely you end up using false or misleading information.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

4 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

课程规则优先Course rule supersedes
Make sure you know and follow the policies for the class or publication you for which you are writing.

编码说明CODING NOTEThe guide defers to each class's or publication's own AI policy rather than asserting one library-wide rule.

52 校中 12 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)12 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

建议披露Recommended
Accordingly, you should cite when an AI tool was used to:

编码说明CODING NOTEFramed as a recommendation (should cite); the library also tells students to follow their class or publication's specific policy.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)11 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

建议留证Recommended主流口径MOST COMMON
Generative AI tools can provide different outputs in response to identical same prompts, so documenting your use of these tools is essential for you to cite them transparently and for later readers to understand your use of the tool.

编码说明CODING NOTEAdvises saving the tool, date, prompts and outputs so that AI use can be cited; no retention or submission rule is stated.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:建议留证(18/19)18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
Always check a source yourself to make it less likely you end up using false or misleading information.

编码说明CODING NOTEWarns AI tools can fabricate or hallucinate sources and tells students to verify sources themselves.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 8 所同样未作表述8 of 52 are likewise silent

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 28 所同样未作表述28 of 52 are likewise silent

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 15 所同样未作表述15 of 52 are likewise silent

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

工具名称Tool name提示词PromptsAI 输出内容AI output正式引注Formal citation使用范围与程度Extent of use

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/36-Wellesley.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 未取得可核实的适用指导No verifiable applicable guidance obtained

两处学院招生页面被访问验证阻断;Common App 学校资料仅确认需提交个人与学校专属文书,不能据此推断 AI 许可或禁止。[S1][S2][S3]

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • Research review: 2026-09-26 Asia/Shanghai; acquisition timestamps are listed per source (UTC).
  • Evidence status: no-verified-guidance
  • Scope: Undergraduate admissions only; do not infer admissions requirements from course rules.
  • Original snapshots were reused without changing original acquisition times. Blocked/empty pages remain marked as such.

中文结论 / Findings

两处学院招生页面被访问验证阻断;Common App 学校资料仅确认需提交个人与学校专属文书,不能据此推断 AI 许可或禁止。[S1][S2][S3]

Official sources and selected original text

[S1] First-Year Applicants

  • 发布单位Publisher Wellesley College Admission & Aid
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.wellesley.edu/admission-aid/apply/first-year-applicants
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate admissions / blocked official page
  • 发布日期Publication date Not stated
  • 采集方式Retrieval blocked-or-http-error; acquired 2026-09-26T02:18:47.578153+00:00

[S2] Application Advice

  • 发布单位Publisher Wellesley College Admission & Aid
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.wellesley.edu/admission-aid/apply/application-advice
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate admissions / blocked official page
  • 发布日期Publication date Not stated
  • 采集方式Retrieval blocked-or-http-error; acquired 2026-09-26T02:18:47.650081+00:00

[S3] Wellesley College on Common App

  • 发布单位Publisher Common Application / Wellesley listing
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.commonapp.org/explore/wellesley-college
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate admissions platform listing / official-platform-listing
  • 发布日期Publication date Not stated
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-visible-text; acquired 2026-09-26T02:20:33.013314+00:00

[S3-Q1]

Students will complete a personal essay and a Wellesley-specific essay.

Evidence boundaries

  • Wellesley 两处招生网页 HTTP 403;Common App listing 非学院 AI 政策。
Negative search record

Three varied official-domain admissions / essay / AI searches were attempted; Google HTML responses exposed no parseable results, so they are inconclusive, not proof of absence. Subsequent web-search provider calls hit HTTP 432 quota. See branch search log.

官方原文The official text

univ/36-Wellesley.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 来源层级Source level院系或项目级 —— 仅适用于某一学院、项目或系Unit or school — applies to one school, programme or department only
  • 抽取审计Extraction audit轻微修正(审计员修正 1 处)Minor corrections (1 corrections by the auditor)
  • 官方来源Official sourceWellesley College Library Research & Instruction
    https://libguides.wellesley.edu/citation/genai
  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Citing Generative AI — Citing Sources] Wellesley College Library Research & Instruction — scope: library citation guidance; authority: official-student-guidance.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Citing Generative AI — Citing Sources


Citing Sources: Citing Generative AI

Introduction

AI tools are rapidly evolving, and the guidance on how to cite content from or acknowledge the use of generative AI from publishers and other scholarly organizations is still being refined.

Make sure you know and follow the policies for the class or publication you for which you are writing.课程规则优先Instructor override

General Principles

When should you cite?

While generative AI tools are relatively new, the reasons we cite

(to give credit for ideas you present and allow readers to understand the process and sources you consulted in your work) remain the same. Accordingly, you should cite when an AI tool was used to:披露要求Disclosure

Gather information

Write text

Edit text

Synthesize ideas or find connections

Clean/manipulate data

Elements to save when using ChatGPT or other AI tools

Regardless of the citation style or system of references you are using, you will need:

Tool name and version (e.g., ChatGPT 4.0)

Time and date of usage

Prompt or query

Output from generative AI tool (as a document, image, or webpage, if the tool does not allow for stable links

)

Follow up queries and responses

Name of person who queried

Generative AI tools can provide different outputs in response to identical same prompts, so documenting your use of these tools is essential for you to cite them transparently and for later readers to understand your use of the tool.过程留证Process evidence

Sources Cited by Generative AI

The nature of large language models (LLM) behind many generative AI products leads the tools to fabricate (or hallucinate) facts, such as sources that may not exist.

These citations may even seem to be highly plausible, using the names of real authors or journal titles in a given field.

Even tools that provide direct links to sources (such as those that are connected to some form of internet search) may misrepresent the content of the materials they cite.

Always check a source yourself to make it less likely you end up using false or misleading information.摘录Excerpt核实责任Verification duty

It would also be a good idea to cite reputable sources in your work, in addition to attributing your use of generative AI. In this way you can give direct credit to authors and institutions instead of AI tools that are trained on this human-generated information.

Citing Generative AI in APA

How to cite ChatGPT [APA Style Blog]

APA recommends that you credit the AI tool as an author in a reference list, as:

"the results of a ChatGPT 'chat' are not retrievable by other readers

, and although non-retrievable data or quotations in APA Style papers are usually cited as personal communications, with ChatGPT-generated text there is no person communicating

.

Quoting ChatGPT’s text from a chat session is, therefore, more like sharing an algorithm’s output; thus, credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation

"

[Quoted from

APA Style Blog above, last updated Feb 23, 2024.]

APA's position can be extended to output from other generative AI tools. APA uses the

Software reference list format to cite material created by generative AI.

EXAMPLE:

In-Text Citation

When prompted with “Is the left brain right brain divide real or a metaphor?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that although the two brain hemispheres are somewhat specialized, “the notation that people can be characterized as ‘left-brained’ or ‘right-brained’ is considered to be an oversimplification and a popular myth” (OpenAI, 2023).

Reference Format

Author. (YYYY). Name of software (Date version) [Type of AI model]. URL

Reference

OpenAI. (2023).

ChatGPT

(Mar 14 version) [Large language model].

https://chat.openai.com/chat

Guidelines for Acknowledging AI Use:

FOR RESEARCH METHODS: "Describe how you used the tool in your Method section."

FOR LITERATURE REVIEWS or ESSAYS: "Describe how you used the tool in your introduction. In your text, provide the prompt you used and then any portion of the relevant text that was generated in response."

FOR REFERENCES: "Credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation"

Citing Generative AI in Chicago

How do you recommend citing content developed or generated by artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT? [Chicago Style Q&A]

Chicago recommends that you credit the AI tool as an author:

"you must credit ChatGPT when you reproduce its words within your own work, but unless you include a publicly available URL

, that information should be put in the text or in a note—not in a bibliography or reference list."

[Quoted from

Chicago Style Q&A above]

Chicago uses the

Personal correspondence reference list format to cite material created by generative AI (see

CMOS

14.214 and

15.53

).

EXAMPLE

In-Text Citation

According to Chicago's linked Q&A, for most types of writing, "you can simply acknowledge the AI tool in your text", e.g.:

The following recipe for pizza dough was generated by ChatGPT:

2 cups flour

1 package active dry yeast

...

Reference Format

For student papers or other situations that require more formal citation, Chicago recommends the following format:

Name of AI Tool, Company that created AI tool, Date Content was generated, URL (to tool if no direct public link to content is available).

Reference

  1. Text generated by ChatGPT, OpenAI, March 7, 2023, https://chat.openai.com/chat.

or (if text of prompt is not included in the body of the text):

  1. ChatGPT, response to “Explain how to make pizza dough from common household ingredients,” OpenAI, March 7, 2023.

Citing Generative AI in MLA

How do I cite generative AI in MLA style? [MLA Style Center]

MLA recommends that you do not credit the AI tool as an author when citing content created by a generative AI tool:

"We do not recommend treating the AI tool as an author. This recommendation follows the policies developed by various publishers, including the MLA’s journal

PMLA

."

[Quoted from

MLA Style Center above, published 17 March 2023.]

Some worked examples included in the linked guide are:

Example 1: Paraphrasing Text

Example 2: Quoting Text

Example 3: Citing Creative Visual Works

Example 4: Quoting Creative Textual Works

Example 5: Citing Secondary Sources Used by an AI Tool

EXAMPLE : Paraphrasing Text

Paraphrased in Your Prose

While the green light in The Great Gatsby might be said to chiefly symbolize four main things: optimism, the unattainability of the American dream, greed, and covetousness (“Describe the symbolism”), arguably the most important—the one that ties all four themes together—is greed.

Works-Cited-List Entry Format

"Title of Source".

Title of AI tool

, Version of AI tool, Company that created AI tool, Date content was generated, URL.

Works-Cited-List Entry

“Describe the symbolism of the green light in the book The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald” prompt.

ChatGPT

, 13 Feb. version, OpenAI, 8 Mar. 2023, chat.openai.com/chat.

Guidelines for Acknowledging AI Use:

Cite a generative AI tool whenever you paraphrase, quote, or incorporate into your own work any content (whether text, image, data, or other) that was created by it.

Acknowledge all functional uses of the tool (like editing your prose or translating words) in a note, your text, or another suitable location, take care to vet the secondary sources it cites.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • Ask for assignment-specific AI permission and distinguish brainstorming, drafting, attribution and independent verification.
  • Keep course-specific requirements separate from campus-wide academic-integrity standards and separate again from admissions instructions.