Dartmouth College达特茅斯学院
ai.policy.nestudy.cn/Dartmouth
选取标准：对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.
Failure to clarify expectations is not an acceptable justification for violating the Academic Honor Policy.
↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source
每项附该校原文中的依据语句，以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深，规定越明确、越具约束力（不代表优劣）；斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.
作业未说明可否使用 AI 时，适用何种规则？When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?
Students may not use GenAI tools for submitted coursework unless expressly permitted.
编码说明CODING NOTEGenAI is barred in submitted coursework unless an instructor expressly permits it.
52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)
任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定？Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?
For academic integrity in a course, the instructor’s GenAI policy defines the expectations for faculty, students, and staff.
编码说明CODING NOTEThe instructor's course policy sets expectations, but any permitted use still remains subject to the Academic Honor Policy and its acknowledgment duty.
52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)
是否设有分级的使用许可框架？Is there a graduated permission framework?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent
使用 AI 是否须予披露？为强制还是建议？Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?
Students must confirm the required disclosure or acknowledgment method with the instructor. If no specific method is provided, students must use a discipline-appropriate citation or acknowledgment.
编码说明CODING NOTEAcknowledgment is mandatory for any permitted use; the student must confirm the method, or default to a discipline-appropriate citation.
52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)
是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史？Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent
AI 输出有误或虚构引注时，由谁负责？Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 14 所同样未作表述14 of 52 are likewise silent
违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性？How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?
Whenever GenAI is permitted, its use remains subject to the Academic Honor Policy.
编码说明CODING NOTEPermitted and unacknowledged GenAI use is handled under the Academic Honor Policy; failure to acknowledge may lead to disciplinary action.
52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)
AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据？Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent
哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具？What must not be entered into an AI tool?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent
是否规定版权及他人材料的使用？Does it regulate the use of copyrighted and others' material?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 27 所同样未作表述27 of 52 are likewise silent
学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具？Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 28 所同样未作表述28 of 52 are likewise silent
规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据？Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?
Dartmouth recognizes GenAI as a powerful learning tool but gives instructors authority to decide whether it may be used, based on course and assignment learning outcomes.
编码说明CODING NOTEInstructor authority over whether GenAI may be used is grounded explicitly in course and assignment learning outcomes.
52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：明确以学习目标为据（22/37）22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)
该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述，以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文，中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料，不是宽严等级；未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.
官方历史播客中，招生负责人认可用AI帮助组织思路，反对外包个人表达；当时“没有政策”不能推出2026年仍无政策。现行文书页强调本人真实声音，未给AI逐项许可或处罚清单。[S1][S2]
52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →undergraduate-advice-ai — 各来源分别标明政策/申请认证或官方建议，不以搜索空白推断许可。官方历史播客中，招生负责人认可用AI帮助组织思路，反对外包个人表达；当时“没有政策”不能推出2026年仍无政策。现行文书页强调本人真实声音，未给AI逐项许可或处罚清单。[S1][S2]
undergraduate)official-advice — 官方招生播客建议，不是正式申请认证。正文是2023年判决后的申请季语境；页面未标具体发布日期。full-text; ordinary GET returned HTTP 200. Accessed/saved: 2026-09-24T23:04:47+08:00[S1-Q1] historical policy status, not a 2026 claim
We don't have a policy either.
[S1-Q2] do not outsource personal expression
I don't like the idea that we are outsourcing our verbal expression to a computer.
[S1-Q3] organization as assistance; self-authorship
And I would say the students don't outsource that to someone besides your own brain. And if it's a tool that helps you get yourself organized, great.
[S1-Q4] supplementary role
So it's a tool. It shouldn't be a crutch.
undergraduate)official-advice — 页面注明Updated July 22, 2026；所引推荐播客简介属于真实性建议，不含AI专项许可。full-text; ordinary GET returned HTTP 200. Accessed/saved: 2026-09-24T23:07:33+08:00[S2-Q1] authentic voice; human editing context
Parents and peers can be helpful editors, but at the heart of every memorable essay is the writer's authentic voice telling the story only they can tell.
将官方建议与正式规则分开。S1只引用Lee Coffin本人的话，不把同集SMU嘉宾对brainstorming的具体意见单独归给Dartmouth；“We don’t have a policy either.”只描述访谈当时。S2的父母/同伴编辑建议也不能类推为AI改写或翻译许可。
实际执行的官方站点定向检索如下。摘要仅用于定位；规则结论均来自已取得的可读官方正文。
site:admissions.dartmouth.edu "ChatGPT" — 找到官方Admissions Beat S4E1/S3E15历史访谈，完整读取S4E1。site:admissions.dartmouth.edu "artificial intelligence" "essays" — 定位招生播客；排除课程及AI研究介绍。site:admissions.dartmouth.edu "AI" "application" "policy" — 未定位到新的独立本科申请AI政策页；结果中有课程内容及噪声，不能据此认定允许。site:admissions.dartmouth.edu "artificial intelligence" "admissions beat" — 另读取S4E5、S6E5；嘉宾/顾问意见不升级为Dartmouth规则。site:admissions.dartmouth.edu "ChatGPT" "essay" "2025" — 读取S8E13嘉宾写作建议，不当作校方政策；另完整检查现行Writing Supplement。局限：
“未说明”不代表允许。本次没有提交申请、创建申请账号、联系学校或修改原有大学资料/网站；未来申请周期、其他路径与院系仍须各自核对。
本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮，句末标签注明对应条款，点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.
Dartmouth recognizes GenAI as a powerful learning tool but gives instructors authority to decide whether it may be used, based on course and assignment learning outcomes.学习理由Learning rationale
Students may not use GenAI tools for submitted coursework unless expressly permitted.默认规则Default rule
Dartmouth therefore treats GenAI as disallowed by default, while allowing instructors to authorize it where pedagogically appropriate.
Instructors are encouraged to define AI policies in the syllabus. For academic integrity in a course, the instructor’s GenAI policy defines the expectations for faculty, students, and staff.课程规则优先Instructor override
Whenever GenAI is permitted, its use remains subject to the Academic Honor Policy.违规定性Integrity framing Students must confirm the required disclosure or acknowledgment method with the instructor. If no specific method is provided, students must use a discipline-appropriate citation or acknowledgment.披露要求Disclosure Failure to acknowledge GenAI use may lead to disciplinary action.
“It is the student's responsibility to clarify questions with their instructor regarding GenAI use in a course and/or instructor expectations for acknowledgement of GenAI.” Failure to clarify expectations is not an acceptable justification for violating the Academic Honor Policy.摘录Excerpt
The policy provides model acknowledgments that identify the tool, model/version, date, prompt or task, and the student’s review or revision.
以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点，非该校原文，不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.