Notre Dame

Using GenAI contrary to an instructor’s stated policy, or using it to complete coursework in a way not expressly permitted by the instructor, violates the Honor Code.

编码说明CODING NOTECoursework use not expressly permitted by the instructor is an Honor Code violation, so permission must be affirmative.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

Representing work that you did not produce as your own, including work generated or materially modified by AI, constitutes academic dishonesty.”Using GenAI contrary to an instructor’s stated policy, or using it to complete coursework in a way not expressly permitted by the instructor, violates the Honor Code.

编码说明CODING NOTEHonor Code bars passing off AI-generated or materially modified work regardless; within that floor the instructor's stated policy sets what is permitted.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

Students should distinguish between supplementing education and replacing it.

编码说明CODING NOTEDistinguishes supportive uses (thinking through ideas, study guides, practice problems) from substitution; no numbered or color-coded ladder.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：非正式分类（15/20）15 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

AI use in university research, scholarship, or work should be clearly documented and disclosed.

编码说明CODING NOTEStated as a 'should' in the broader university principles and framed around research/scholarship/work rather than as a coursework requirement.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）11 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

Notre Dame’s broader guidance says AI-generated content may be biased, inaccurate, fabricated, or contain copyrighted or proprietary information, so thorough human review is required before use.

编码说明CODING NOTEThorough human review of AI output is required before use because it may be biased, inaccurate, or fabricated.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：须自行核实（17/38）17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

Representing work that you did not produce as your own, including work generated or materially modified by AI, constitutes academic dishonesty.

编码说明CODING NOTEClassified as academic dishonesty and an Honor Code violation; the word plagiarism is not used, and 'materially modified' work is covered.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

Notre Dame’s broader guidance says AI-generated content may be biased, inaccurate, fabricated, or contain copyrighted or proprietary information, so thorough human review is required before use.

编码说明CODING NOTEFlags that AI output may contain copyrighted or proprietary material, to be caught by human review before use.

52 校中 25 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：有明确规定（25/25）25 of 52 take this position · most common: Addressed (25/25)

However, using AI “as a substitute for genuine engagement, or to circumvent the necessary intellectual challenges of your coursework, runs counter to the heart of education itself.

编码说明CODING NOTERules are justified by the need to preserve genuine engagement and the intellectual challenge of coursework.

52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：明确以学习目标为据（22/37）22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)