← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.50 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.50 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

HKUST

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology香港科技大学中国香港Hong Kong

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 4 / 12 项有明文规定4 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 未取得可核实指导Admissions · No verifiable guidance

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

If you use ChatGPT or other AI tools in your work, you need to acknowledge it.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

4 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

建议披露Recommended
When appropriate, acknowledge or label AI-generated content to maintain transparency and uphold academic integrity.

编码说明CODING NOTEThe institutional guideline asks for acknowledgement “when appropriate”; the library guide words it more firmly but is not policy.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)11 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
Always verify and fact-check AI-generated outputs carefully, as generative AI may produce inaccurate or fabricated information ("hallucinations").

编码说明CODING NOTEITSO requires always verifying and fact-checking AI outputs; Library guide adds detailed steps for cross-checking citations.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 8 所同样未作表述8 of 52 are likewise silent

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

禁止上传受限数据Restricted data prohibited主流口径MOST COMMON
Avoid inputting confidential, sensitive, or personal data into generative AI tools.

编码说明CODING NOTEITSO instructs avoiding confidential, sensitive, or personal data and undesensitized confidential documents in AI tools.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:禁止上传受限数据(20/31)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
ITSO helps HKUST members use generative AI by offering a set of tools that they can access.

编码说明CODING NOTEITSO offers HKUST members a set of AI tools via a tools webpage; Library guide names HKUST Open WebUI as HKUST's AI tool.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 15 所同样未作表述15 of 52 are likewise silent

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

AI 输出内容AI output使用范围与程度Extent of use

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/50-HKUST.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 未取得可核实的适用指导No verifiable applicable guidance obtained

HKUST本科直录指南要求提交个人陈述,国际资格页面列明材料;未核实本科申请文书AI专项规则。校内成员ITSO使用指南不是本科招生指导。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • Status: no-verified-guidance (see scope of each source; not a blanket university-wide rule).
  • 中文结论:HKUST本科直录指南要求提交个人陈述,国际资格页面列明材料;未核实本科申请文书AI专项规则。校内成员ITSO使用指南不是本科招生指导。
  • 原文引句与中文概述分开;原文来自保存的官方正文,经空白归一化对照。检索未发现规定不意味着允许使用。

[S1] Direct Entry Application Guide

  • 发布单位Publisher HKUST Undergraduate Recruitment and Admissions Office
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate direct entry application / official-application-guide
  • 官方链接Official URL https://join.hkust.edu.hk/oas/de_guide.pdf
  • 最终页面地址Final URL https://join.hkust.edu.hk/oas/de_guide.pdf
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated; accessed: 2026-09-26T02:18:49.137997+00:00
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-visible-text; HTTP 200; saved body: sources/50-HKUST-S1.txt

[S1-Q1] statement required

Please note that your application will be put on hold until we receive your personal statement.

[S2] Application Procedures: International Qualifications

[S2-Q1] statement and documents

You are required to include identity documents, a personal statement, high school transcripts for the past three years, proof of English language proficiency,

申请AI专项检索记录 / Admissions AI searches

检索结果只能用于发现线索;不能以检索未命中断言不存在政策。

  • site:join.hkust.edu.hk "generative AI" "personal statement" — Google HTTP 200 but rendered related-query/navigation links only; no reliable official result extractable from returned HTML. Separately reviewed saved official undergraduate bodies; no verified AI-specific rule from this search alone.
  • site:join.hkust.edu.hk "ChatGPT" "application" — Google HTTP 200 but rendered related-query/navigation links only; no reliable official result extractable from returned HTML. Separately reviewed saved official undergraduate bodies; no verified AI-specific rule from this search alone.
  • site:join.hkust.edu.hk "original" "personal statement" — Google HTTP 200 but rendered related-query/navigation links only; no reliable official result extractable from returned HTML. Separately reviewed saved official undergraduate bodies; no verified AI-specific rule from this search alone.

适用边界 / Gaps

  • 入学申请和入学后的课程作业是不同场景;未核实的AI规则不作许可。

官方原文The official text

univ/50-HKUST.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Generative AI Usage Guidelines] HKUST Information Technology Services Office — scope: HKUST members / general tool use; authority: institutional-usage-guidelines. [AI Literacy] HKUST Library — scope: library information-literacy resource; not independent academic policy; authority: official-library-resource.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Generative AI Usage Guidelines


Generative AI Usage Guidelines

HKUST encourages its members to embrace generative AI tools to enhance productivity, support knowledge advancement, and foster innovation. To ensure responsible and ethical use, please adhere to this guideline when using generative AI tools.

Generative AI Tools

ITSO helps HKUST members use generative AI by offering a set of tools that they can access.机构工具Institutional tools Please refer to the

Generative AI Tools webpage below for a list of tools available to HKUST members.

Responsible and Ethical Use

Users shall not use generative AI tools for any unlawful, harmful, or malicious activities, including but not limited to fraud, harassment, defamation, or infringement of rights.

Always verify and fact-check AI-generated outputs carefully, as generative AI may produce inaccurate or fabricated information ("hallucinations").核实责任Verification duty

Be aware that generative AI systems may reflect biases or discriminatory tendencies present in their training data. Users are responsible for critically evaluating AI outputs and reporting any biased or discriminatory content encountered.

When appropriate, acknowledge or label AI-generated content to maintain transparency and uphold academic integrity.披露要求Disclosure

Data Privacy and Security

Most of the commercial generative AI tools have stated that users’ submitted data may be used for training and product enhancement. Users are advised not to use confidential HKUST documents in those tools unless they are desensitized

.

Avoid inputting confidential, sensitive, or personal data into generative AI tools.数据与隐私Data & privacy

Comply with HKUST’s data protection policies and relevant laws when using AI tools, ensuring personal data privacy is safeguarded.

AI Literacy


AI Literacy for End-Users: Use AI Wisely

This guide is created to help HKUST students and staff develop their "AI Literacy" in the realm of higher education learning, teaching, and research. It is a work in progress

HKUST Info & Guidelines

Generative AI & Education

  • Maintained by HKUST's Center for Education and Innovation. It provides information on HKUST's current guidelines on the use of generative AI and further information, including:

HKUST's AI Tool

:

HKUST Open WebUI

When is it OK to use a generative tool (AI)?

Check & Cross-check the Results

A common problem with many generative AI text tools is that they generate nonsense, especially made-up citations (references).

So, if you are using texts that you created using ChatGPT or other AI tools, use your eyes and your brain to check the work. Evaluate the information provided, just like anything you plan to use academically. More info on how to evaluate below:

Evaulate GenAI Output

Evaluating AI Output Systematically

  1. Cross-check what it says & do "lateral reading"

Check against your own knowledge

Check against

Wikipedia or

Britannica

See if other reliable sources state the same thing

This is not new with generative AI, it's always been good scholarly practice

  1. Confirm that any references it provides are real

Check them against

PowerSearch

,

Google Scholar

, etc.

  1. If the references (citations) are real, check that they support the claim

This is *

NOT

  • a new issue with AI tools, it's always been important to do so.

This is proper scholarly practice when working with sources both in print and online.

  1. If you use ChatGPT or other AI tools in your work, you need to acknowledge it.摘录Excerpt