← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.51 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.51 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Imperial

Imperial College London帝国理工学院英国UK

来源层级 · 校级通用Source level · University-wide 9 / 12 项有明文规定9 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 仅本人写作/真实性要求Admissions · Authenticity requirement only

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Guard against AI “hallucinations” by fact-checking every statement before use.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

9 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

默认禁止Prohibited by default主流口径MOST COMMON
Unless explicitly authorised, using AI to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating

编码说明CODING NOTEUnauthorised AI use on assessed work may be treated as an offence unless the student has explicit authorisation.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
Further requirements may be stipulated for a particular piece of assessed work where AI tools are allowed or required. This must be made clear to students when it is set.

编码说明CODING NOTECourse/module requirements can permit or require AI tools but must be told to students; departments vary (S2-760).

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

非正式分类Informal categories主流口径MOST COMMON
for a particular piece of assessed work where AI tools are allowed or required

编码说明CODING NOTEDistinguishes assessed work where AI is merely allowed from work where it is required, without a formal named scale.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

建议披露Recommended
You should include a statement to acknowledge your use of generative AI tools for all assessed work

编码说明CODING NOTEModal is 'should' (a recommendation), not 'must'; exact disclosure content may depend on department/course guidelines.

52 校中 11 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)11 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

建议留证Recommended主流口径MOST COMMON
If relevant, the prompt(s) used to generate a response in the AI system.

编码说明CODING NOTEFramed as an additional requirement that may be stipulated per assignment, not a blanket duty for all students.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:建议留证(18/19)18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
Guard against AI “hallucinations” by fact-checking every statement before use.

编码说明CODING NOTEStudents must fact-check every AI-generated statement to guard against fabricated hallucinations.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

学术不端Academic integrity violation主流口径MOST COMMON
Unless explicitly authorised, using AI to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating under Imperial’s

编码说明CODING NOTEUnauthorised AI use on assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating under the academic integrity regulations.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
designed to give you safe, easy access to multiple generative AI models (such as GPT, Claude, Deepseek, and others) through a single interface. It's built to support teaching, learning, and research while ensuring data protection and institutional compliance.

编码说明CODING NOTEdAIsy is Imperial's own AI platform with built-in data protection; a separate ICT page also lists supported tools.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

明确以学习目标为据Explicit learning-objective rationale主流口径MOST COMMON
uncritical AI use often yields generic, superficial text lacking true insight and will not demonstrate learning or substantial communication.

编码说明CODING NOTEUncritical AI use is said to fail to demonstrate learning, tying voice/disclosure rules to learning objectives.

52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

工具名称Tool name使用范围与程度Extent of use正式引注Formal citation提示词PromptsAI 输出内容AI output编辑历史Editing history

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/51-Imperial.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科本人写作/真实性要求(未证实细化 AI 边界)Own-work and authenticity requirements; no detailed AI boundaries verified

Imperial 中央本科个人陈述页要求呈现本人的动机、勿抄他人,并说明 UCAS 相似度检测;没有核实该本科页的 AI 专项限制。唯一已读取 AI 招生建议来自 Imperial Business School 的项目招生博客,不能外推本科。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 证据状态Evidence status authenticity-only
  • 采集说明Research acquisition source-specific ISO dates below (not publication dates).
  • 适用范围Scope 本科招生与个人陈述;研究生和在校生作业规则单独区分。

中文结论 / Findings

  • [S2-Q1][S2-Q2] 本科官方要求表达本人动机,避免抄袭他人;UCAS 的相似度检测不等于「AI 探测」或 Imperial AI 禁令。
  • [S1-Q1] Business School 招生博客谈 AI 的构思、结构、亲自写句子,但其商学院项目/视频面试语境非中央本科申请;不外推。
  • 本科 AI 专项校级规则未由这些来源验证;另见已收录的UCAS平台指导,其规则不等于 Imperial 自有规定。

Official sources and short original excerpts

[S2] Study / Undergraduate / Personal statement

[S2-Q1] 本人表达

Your personal statement should be about you so don't focus on what your friends are writing.

[S2-Q2] 勿抄袭

Also avoid the temptation to copy anyone else's.

[S1] Imperial Business School / AI in admissions

[S1-Q1] 院系博客建议

Use AI thoughtfully but sparingly: it’s fine to brainstorm or check structure, but write your own sentences.

Limitations

  • Imperial Business School 博客未明言适用于中央本科招生,含项目特有视频申请要求,保守限定为商学院招生建议(该博客未明确列出适用学位级别);不能声称所有 Imperial 本科或研究生也适用。
  • 本科个人陈述官方页面没有出现 AI/ChatGPT 专项段落。

High-school adaptation (researcher recommendation; not university policy)

  • 每项课程、项目或评估先查教师书面规则;文书由申请人真实反思并亲自核对事实。
  • 明确区分可用于构思或校对、可提交的内容与不可在面试/评估使用的工具;勿将大学在校作业规则照搬入高中或本科申请。

Shared system boundary

另见UCAS平台AI指导。该文是共享平台材料,不能当作本校独立政策,也不能覆盖校方更具体的要求。

官方原文The official text

univ/51-Imperial.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Library Services / Generative AI guidance] Imperial College London — scope: all-students-academic-work; authority: official-student-guidance. [Generative AI and Study Guidance Hub] Imperial College London — scope: all-current-students; authority: official-student-guidance.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Library Services / Generative AI guidance


Generative AI guidance

About Generative AI

Generative AI tools automatically create content, including text, code, images, and more, based on user prompts. Text-focused tools are known as Large Language Models (LLMs) and use collections of existing data to predict outputs. They offer rapid content generation but can produce unreliable outputs, making them unsuitable for unverified academic use.

For a list of Imperial-supported Gen AI tools, please see the

ICT Training and resources page

.

Appropriate academic use of generative

AI

Consider use of AI outputs as a starting point for research only and rely on academic sources such as databases and peer-reviewed sources. Developing critical thinking and evaluation skills is a key aspect of your education at Imperial.

It is very important that as a student you review your department’s current policy on appropriate use and disclosure of generative AI in academic work.

If you use generative AI as a search tool, be sure to verify all information and cite any material you use for academic purposes.

Guard against AI “hallucinations” by fact-checking every statement before use.摘录Excerpt核实责任Verification duty

Preserve your own voice in written work - uncritical AI use often yields generic, superficial text lacking true insight and will not demonstrate learning or substantial communication.学习理由Learning rationale

Imperial guidance and support

Review your department’s current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work.

Consult your

Subject Librarian and library resources for advice on evaluating and selecting scholarly sources.

Refer to the guidance below as well as the library’s reference management pages for acknowledgement and referencing guidance.

Unless explicitly authorised, using AI to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating默认规则Default rule under Imperial’s违规定性Integrity framing

Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations.

Familiarise yourself with

Imperial’s Academic Misconduct Policy for rules on appropriate AI usage.

Acknowledging and referencing use of generative AI tool s

Acknowledging

A statement of acknowledgment shows the reader which AI tool you used and for what specific purpose. You should include a statement to acknowledge your use of generative AI tools for all assessed work披露要求Disclosure, in accordance with guidelines from your department or course team.

This statement should be written in complete sentences and include the following information:

Name and version of the generative AI tool e.g.

Copilot,

ChatGPT-5.6

Publisher (name of company that provides the AI system) e.g. Microsoft, OpenAI

URL of the AI tool

Brief description (single sentence) of the way in which the tool was used

(e.g. summarising notes, generating outlines)

Confirmation that the work is your own

Example:

I acknowledge the use of Microsoft Copilot (https://copilot.cloud.microsoft) to generate an outline for background study. I confirm that no content generated by AI has been presented as my own work.

Further requirements may be stipulated for a particular piece of assessed work where AI tools are allowed or required分级许可Tiered scale. This must be made clear to students when it is set.课程规则优先Instructor override If unclear, please clarify with your module leader. Additional requirements may include expanded description in the ‘Acknowledgements’ or ‘Methods’ section, such as:

If relevant, the prompt(s) used to generate a response in the AI system.过程留证Process evidence

The date the output was generated.

The output obtained (e.g. a ‘link to chat’ if ChatGPT, or a compilation of all output generated as an appendix).

How the output was changed for use or incorporation into a piece of work (e.g. a tracked-changes document or a descriptive paragraph).

Referencing

Referencing guidance is provided for Harvard and Vancouver referencing styles on the following pages:

Your reference list and bibliography – Harvard

Your reference list and bibliography – Vancouver

Additional resources

Link to GenAI student course

Introduction to GenAI student course – revised for 2026

Have you completed Imperial's Introduction to Generative AI course yet? This short, Imperial-produced training experience is for all students, and may answer many of the questions you might have about how GenAI interacts with your studies.

Generative AI and Study Guidance Hub


Generative AI and Study Guidance Hub

Have you checked out ICT's helpful guidance for the use of GenAI tools?

Welcome to the Generative AI and Study Guidance Hub, a resource for Imperial's student community about the use of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) at the university.

What is Generative AI?

GenAI creates new content from user prompts based on patterns from existing collections of data.

Several natural language processing models have come to prominence, such as

Microsoft Copilot

. These models demonstrate a huge step forward in accessible forms of genAI which will develop substantially and quickly in the years to come. In fact, they will likely grow to become a tool we use frequently in our everyday lives.

For students, we anticipate that these genAI models present you with opportunities to explore new ways of studying and learning. For Imperial, there will be opportunities to further improve the quality of the teaching and assessment we offer on your degree programme.

You can also check out dAIsy – Imperial's new AI platform

, designed to give you safe, easy access to multiple generative AI models (such as GPT, Claude, Deepseek, and others) through a single interface. It's built to support teaching, learning, and research while ensuring data protection and institutional compliance.机构工具Institutional tools

How can I find out more and get trained up?

Have you completed Imperial's Introduction to Generative AI course yet? It is a short, Imperial-produced training experience for all students, and may answer many of the questions you might have about how genAI interacts with your studies.

It is available for:

Faculty of Medicine students

Faculty of Natural Sciences

Faculty of Engineering

Imperial Business School

All students who may be unaffiliated with any specific faculty

You might also wish to browse the

Imperial Generative AI checklist

, to ensure you have familiarised yourself with all the ways genAI can impact your studies.

Imperial's approach to Generative AI

Imperial’s

Generative AI principles established the core v alues used by the university when interacting with genAI tools. They prompt thinking and aid approaches to using this technology in thoughtful an d inform ed ways.

Further information, guidance, and support

Guidance for students

Library Services have collated FAQs, referencing support, and additional resources. These are intended to be considered alongside Imperial's introductory course, genAI principles, and departmental guidance.

Introduction to Generative AI – Revised for 2026

An online tutorial has been developed to help you answer any initial questions you may have on the use of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in your studies. This is an updated version of the tutorial from 2025.

Guidance from departments

Departments may take differing views on how genAI is best applied in teaching and assessment environments. It is recommended that you speak with staff to establish how genAI might interact with your programme.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • 每项课程、项目或评估先查教师书面规则;文书由申请人真实反思并亲自核对事实。
  • 明确区分可用于构思或校对、可提交的内容与不可在面试/评估使用的工具;勿将大学在校作业规则照搬入高中或本科申请。