← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.39 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.39 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

LSE

London School of Economics and Political Science伦敦政治经济学院英国UK

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 6 / 12 项有明文规定6 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Before using AI tools in your academic work, always check your department's guidance.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

6 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

交由教师决定Instructor decides, no default
In advance of the start of the academic year, all academic departments must agree department-wide or course-level positions on the authorised use of generative AI in assessment within one of the following positions:

编码说明CODING NOTENo universal default; each department must adopt one of three School-defined positions before term starts.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
Unless your Department or course convenor indicates otherwise, the use of AI tools for grammar and spell-checking is not included in the full prohibition under Position 1

编码说明CODING NOTEDepartments/convenors may adjust details (e.g. grammar-checking) but must choose within the School's three defined positions.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

明确分级框架Explicit named scale
Position 1: No authorised use of generative AI in assessment.

编码说明CODING NOTEThree named positions (no, limited, or full authorised use) that departments select for assessment.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)5 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 6 所同样未作表述6 of 52 are likewise silent

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 14 所同样未作表述14 of 52 are likewise silent

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 8 所同样未作表述8 of 52 are likewise silent

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

一般性提醒General caution
As with all cloud services (including Sharepoint or Google Drive), please be careful with what you upload.

编码说明CODING NOTEGeneral caution about what to upload to AI tools, likened to caution with any cloud service.

52 校中 9 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:禁止上传受限数据(20/31)9 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
Claude is an AI assistant from Anthropic, available to you through LSE's Claude for Education partnership.

编码说明CODING NOTELSE gives students free enterprise-licensed access to Claude and Copilot.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

一般性表述General statement
AI tools can complement and support your learning, helping you to explore ideas, understand complex material, plan your work, or think through difficult concepts.

编码说明CODING NOTEStates AI can support learning generally, without a stated limit against replacing assessed skills.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

该校的分级框架Its permission levels

  1. Position 1: No authorised use of generative AI in assessment.
  2. Position 2: Limited authorised use of generative AI in assessment.
  3. Position 3: Full authorised use of generative AI in assessment.

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/39-LSE.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界(效力见来源)Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

LSE本科招生不鼓励AI创作个人陈述,并明确保留对与旧文书显著相似或用AI创作的陈述拒绝申请的权利;同页又列初步构思、与教师核验的荐读、本人原文校对为建设性用途。应结合两段阅读,不等于一切AI辅助都被禁止。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai
  • 采集说明Research acquisition source-specific ISO dates below (not publication dates).
  • 适用范围Scope 本科招生与个人陈述;研究生和在校生作业规则单独区分。

中文结论 / Findings

  • [S1-Q1][S1-Q5] LSE 不鼓励生成式 AI 创作个人陈述,除质量提醒外,还明确保留对与以前提交文书显著相似或用AI创作的个人陈述拒绝申请的权利;应与同页有限辅助建议一起阅读,不是「任何 AI 使用一律禁止」。
  • [S1-Q2][S1-Q3][S1-Q4] 构思、推荐阅读并与教师核对、校对原创文字是所举建设性用途。
  • [S1] 2026 年 9 月入学起 UCAS 个人陈述分三问、总计 4,000 字符;仅接受通过 UCAS 提交的陈述。

Official sources and short original excerpts

[S1] Undergraduate Admissions / Personal statement

[S1-Q1] 不鼓励 AI 代写

We do not encourage applicants to use generative Artificial Intelligence tools to create their personal statement as they do not produce high-quality personal statements and may lead to rejection.

[S1-Q2] 初步构思

generate initial ideas.

[S1-Q3] 荐读需核对

suggest reading materials or references for you to explore (to be cross-checked with teachers for relevance).

[S1-Q4] 校对本人文字

proofread original writing.

[S1-Q5] 明确保留拒绝申请的权利

We reserve the right to reject your application where it has been found that a statement has significant similarities to a previous submission or has been created with the use of Artificial Intelligence (using tools such as ChatGPT).

Limitations

  • LSE 招生页面未提供每一种 AI 用途的披露模板或检测规则;不得把学生评估许可转为招生许可。

High-school adaptation (researcher recommendation; not university policy)

  • 每项课程、项目或评估先查教师书面规则;文书由申请人真实反思并亲自核对事实。
  • 明确区分可用于构思或校对、可提交的内容与不可在面试/评估使用的工具;勿将大学在校作业规则照搬入高中或本科申请。

Shared system boundary

另见UCAS平台AI指导。该文是共享平台材料,不能当作本校独立政策,也不能覆盖校方更具体的要求。

官方原文The official text

univ/39-LSE.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Digital Skills Lab/面向在校生的指导] London School of Economics and Political Science — scope: current-students; authority: official-student-guidance. [School position on generative AI] London School of Economics and Political Science — scope: school-wide-assessment; implemented by department/course; authority: university-assessment-framework.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Digital Skills Lab/面向在校生的指导


Generative AI

This page is for LSE students. If you're a member of staff, please refer to the staff generative AI guidance.

AI tools can complement and support your learning, helping you to explore ideas, understand complex material, plan your work, or think through difficult concepts.学习理由Learning rationale

As an LSE student, you've got free access to two AI tools:

Claude and

Copilot

. Both come with enterprise-level privacy protections, so your data stays private and isn't used to train the underlying models.

We encourage you to experiment with both tools and find what works for you. For example, you might use Claude to work through a research question, break down a complex reading, or explore a concept you're finding difficult. Copilot can help you summarise material, draft emails, or think through ideas via the Copilot Chat interface.

Before using either tool in your academic work, always check your department's guidance. You'll find this in your Moodle course under General Information. We've also linked to some onward policy and guidance resources further down this page.

Claude

Claude is an AI assistant from Anthropic, available to you through LSE's Claude for Education partnership.机构工具Institutional tools It's useful for working through complex material, getting coding help, breaking down difficult concepts, and thinking through research questions.

How to get access:

You'll need to request access before you can use Claude. Once approved, you can use it through the web and mobile app.

Request access to Claude

.

Learning resources:

We have a range of resources to help you build confidence with Claude. We'd recommend starting with the AI Fluency course before diving in.

AI Fluency: Framework and Foundations

: This gives you a practical framework for using AI tools responsibly at LSE. A good starting point before using either tool.

We run in-person practical workshops thoughout the year, please check our booking system

.

The

DSL Learning Hub has guides on Claude's key features, FAQs, and tips on how to use it effectively in your studies.

Copilot

Microsoft Copilot Chat is available to all LSE students through your institutional account. You can use it to help with writing, summarising, researching, and thinking through ideas.

How to get access:

Sign in at copilot.microsoft.com with your LSE IT account. No separate registration needed. It works through Microsoft Edge and Google Chrome on both Windows and Mac.

Learning resources:

We have a range of resources to help you build confidence with Copilot. We'd recommend starting with the AI Fluency course before diving in.

AI Fluency: Framework and Foundations

: This gives you a practical framework for using AI tools responsibly at LSE. A good starting point before using either tool.

We run in-person practical workshops thoughout the year, please check our booking system

.

MS Learn also has a number of online resources including

Getting started with M365 Copilot and

Craft effective prompts for M365 Copilot

.

Privacy and policy

Your data and privacy

For Claude, as part of LSE's agreement with Anthropic, your prompts and data are never used to train Claude's models, and the platform has enterprise-grade security controls in place. LSE's partnership with Anthropic runs through to 2027.

For Copilot, your LSE access uses Commercial Data Protection. This means Microsoft doesn't use your prompts or responses to train its AI models and data stays within the LSE Microsoft environment.

As with all cloud services (including Sharepoint or Google Drive), please be careful with what you upload.数据与隐私Data & privacy We encourage you to apply the

4D framework

, which outlines how to use these tools responsibly.

Using AI in your academic work

The following LSE-wide policies also apply to you:

LSE guidelines on the use of generative AI in education

LSE guidance on the use of generative AI for research

LSE AI legal and regulatory guidance

Before using AI tools in your academic work, always check your department's guidance.摘录Excerpt You'll generally find this in your Moodle course under General Information.

School position on generative AI


School position on generative AI

School position on the use of generative AI in assessment 2025/26

In advance of the start of the academic year, all academic departments must agree department-wide or course-level positions on the authorised use of generative AI in assessment within one of the following positions:默认规则Default rule

Position 1: No authorised use of generative AI in assessment.分级许可Tiered scale*

Position 2: Limited authorised use of generative AI in assessment.

Position 3: Full authorised use of generative AI in assessment.

*

Unless your Department or course convenor indicates otherwise, the use of AI tools for grammar and spell-checking is not included in the full prohibition under Position 1课程规则优先Instructor override

.

Departments and/or course convenors are expected to clearly communicate their position to their students.

For more information, see the School

Guidelines on the use of generative AI in education for the academic year 2024/25

(approved by Education Committee in Summer Term 2024). These guidelines will remain in place for 2026/27 as well.

The School periodically reviews its approach to the use of Generative AI in teaching, learning and assessment in consultation with staff and students.

Observed assessment policy

In June 2025, the School introduced an

Observed Assessment policy on the use of generative AI in assessment.

In 2025/26, Education Committee approved the continuation of the policy into AY2026/27. The normal deadline for the Annual Course Guide Review (ACGR) of Tuesday 5 May 2026 applies for Departments to submit all assessment updates (alongside all other updates to course guides).

LSE Principles and Guidance for AI-assisted Marking and Feedback

In Autumn Term 2025, Education Committee approved a set of principles, accompanying guidance and scenarios to inform the use of AI-assisted marking and feedback at LSE. These principles and the accompanying guidance have been actioned for a pilot year in 2025/26 and will then be reviewed.

Download the paper here

(pdf)

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • 每项课程、项目或评估先查教师书面规则;文书由申请人真实反思并亲自核对事实。
  • 明确区分可用于构思或校对、可提交的内容与不可在面试/评估使用的工具;勿将大学在校作业规则照搬入高中或本科申请。