← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.40 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.40 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Claremont McKenna

Claremont McKenna College克莱蒙特·麦肯纳学院

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 9 / 12 项有明文规定9 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

However, the content generated by ChatGPT should not replace your own original thoughts and ideas.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

9 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

交由教师决定Instructor decides, no default
You should consider addressing AI tools in your course policies. When it comes to AI tools, how do you define appropriate use in the context of your course(s)?

编码说明CODING NOTEThe faculty guide leaves the AI rule to each instructor; no college-wide default is stated.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
Not sure what your professor expects of you? Ask! It’s important to know the instructor’s preferred citation style, policies on things like the use of calculators, and what level of collaboration is allowed in that class.

编码说明CODING NOTEProfessors set course rules under CMC’s academic integrity standards.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

非正式分类Informal categories主流口径MOST COMMON
You are allowed to receive only two categories of help while completing an assignment:

编码说明CODING NOTEDistinguishes categories of allowed help (e.g. questions vs. outside/AI help needing acknowledgement), not a formal named ladder.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

依课程而定Course dependent
When and how should students disclose their usage of AI tools?

编码说明CODING NOTEFaculty decide and communicate their own disclosure rule; no single CMC-wide AI disclosure standard is set here.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

建议留证Recommended主流口径MOST COMMON
Require students to save multiple drafts/versions in google docs or Box

编码说明CODING NOTEFaculty are advised, as a strategy, to require students to keep multiple drafts/versions; not a stated university-wide mandate.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:建议留证(18/19)18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 14 所同样未作表述14 of 52 are likewise silent

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

明确等同抄袭Explicitly plagiarism
Misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own original work constitutes plagiarism.

编码说明CODING NOTEStated in sample syllabus language offered to faculty; CMC’s own statement applies its plagiarism rules to internet sources.

52 校中 13 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)13 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

质疑其可靠性Reliability questioned
AI detectors are unreliable. No AI detector can provide definitive proof.

编码说明CODING NOTEAI detectors are called unreliable and unable to give definitive proof; no adjudication limit on their use is stated.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:不得作为唯一或主要证据(8/14)5 of 52 take this position · most common: Not sole or primary evidence (8/14)

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 28 所同样未作表述28 of 52 are likewise silent

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

明确以学习目标为据Explicit learning-objective rationale主流口径MOST COMMON
Help them understand that learning, thinking, and writing are skills and processes that they must ultimately cultivate and develop on their own, over time.

编码说明CODING NOTERules rest on the idea that writing and thinking are skills students must develop themselves, not outsource to AI.

52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

工具名称Tool name使用范围与程度Extent of use正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/40-Claremont-McKenna.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界(效力见来源)Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

CMC本科新生申请说明的Essay Support and Artificial Intelligence明确:AI若使用仅限语法、标点、拼写等基础校对;文书须申请人自己写,不可由他人撰写、改写、深度编辑或根本改变想法。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 采集记录Research record official source snapshots acquired at the exact UTC times listed below; reviewed for the 2026-09-26 college-fair expansion.
  • 适用范围Scope application; academic course rules and undergraduate-admission rules must not be interchanged.
  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai. This is a classification of verified evidence, not a permission rating.

中文结论 / Findings

  • CMC本科新生申请说明直接限定AI:若选择用AI,应限于基础校对(语法、标点、拼写)。[S1-Q1]
  • 该段同样禁止他人撰写、改写、重度编辑或根本改变作文想法,要求申请者本人写作;不能把“AI可校对”延伸为可生成论证或段落。[S1-Q2][S1-Q3]
  • 名称说明:展会清单缩写 CMC 按美国文理学院语境对应 Claremont McKenna College;不是从PDF取得的完整英文拼写。

Official sources and original excerpts

[S1] Application Instructions for First-Year Applicants | Claremont McKenna College

[S1-Q1] English original (verbatim excerpt)

If you choose to use AI, it should be limited to basic proofreading, such as correcting grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.

[S1-Q2] English original (verbatim excerpt)

However, it is not acceptable for anyone else to write, rewrite, or heavily edit your essay, or fundamentally change your ideas.

[S1-Q3] English original (verbatim excerpt)

In short, your essays should be written by you.

Limits and high-school adaptation

  • AI段落在2026-09-26取得的招生页面中核实,但该页面混有不同申请周期信息,AI段落本身未标明生效日期;实际申请时须复核当季规定,不据此保证2028年AI规则不变。
  • 研究者建议(非校方新增条款):用自己的构思和表述写文书;如确需AI,仅作基础拼写、标点、语法校对,并逐条复核,勿让工具代写或重写。

AI-boundary search record

  • site:cmc.edu/admission/first-year-application-instructions "AI" essay — Official first-year application instructions saved; AI paragraph verified in full visible source.

官方原文The official text

univ/40-Claremont-McKenna.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Generative AI and the Classroom: Tips and Ideas] Claremont McKenna College (faculty-facing PDF) — scope: faculty/classroom; authority: faculty-teaching-advice / sample-syllabus-not-university-policy. [Promoting Academic Integrity at CMC | Claremont McKenna College] Claremont McKenna College, Academic Success — scope: CMC students/faculty/staff; authority: official-academic-integrity-guidance.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Generative AI and the Classroom: Tips and Ideas


Generative AI and the Classroom: Tips and Ideas As AI tools become more prevalent (and more difficult to avoid), it’s important to learn more about them in relation to your discipline. The links below provide a helpful overview.

Learn more about how students are using AI tools as part of their regular study habits and as part of their research and writing practices. A current student at Columbia has written about this in the Chronicle. Remember that the incoming class of 2027 will have encountered AI tools as part of their high school education.

Talk to your students about the drawbacks and limitations of AI tools. Help them understand that learning, thinking, and writing are skills and processes that they must ultimately cultivate and develop on their own, over time.学习理由Learning rationale Make sure they understand the limitations of AI tools in relation to your particular discipline.

Discuss AI tools with your students and be clear about your rules and expectations You should consider addressing AI tools in your course policies. When it comes to AI tools, how do you define appropriate use in the context of your course(s)?默认规则Default rule When and how should students disclose their usage of AI tools?披露要求Disclosure A crowd-sourced list of course policies from various institutions is available here. And see the end of the document for links to useful resource pages and samples of syllabus language developed by members of the ASC and the ChatGPT working group.

Consider how you might adjust your assignments, taking AI tools into account:

● Refine your assignments to reduce the likelihood that students will turn to AI tools.

o Think about your goals: what is the best way to achieve them, and how will you assess whether or not students have actually learned things? Test your prompts on ChatGPT, for example, to get a sense of what it can and cannot do, and remember that you can generate different outputs by refining your prompt.

o Be specific and require students to engage closely with course materials and ongoing in- class discussions (AI tools such as ChatGPT won’t have access to the particular ideas raised in your class, for example)

o Require students to incorporate quotations and citations (AI bots have difficulty with both, at least for now…)

o Ask your students to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways (both in and out of class, written and oral, etc.)

● Think beyond the traditional analytical essay assignment o Oral components (presentations, debates, etc.)

o Multimodal projects o Applied/experiential learning o Written assignments that center on personal/local experience or that incorporate creative modes and elements o Seminar journals/responses – between one class and the next, have students reflect on what came up in class

● Strategize about how your students will be writing and submitting their work o Make use of in-class writing, either by hand or on an institutional device (e.g. with wifi disabled).

o Require students to save multiple drafts/versions in google docs or Box过程留证Process evidence o Set clear expectations about citation and attribution What to do when you suspect a student used AI tools

● Consider your rules and expectations o What policies with respect to AI tools do you have in place? And how/when have you communicated with your students about using AI tools?

● Consider whether the submitted work actually fulfills the assignment.

o This in itself could be grounds for not accepting it, giving it a low grade, or asking the student to resubmit.

● Identify what, in particular, made you suspect that AI tools might be involved. For example:

o voice, tone, formulaic/repetitive structure o lack of engagement with sources; citations are strange, wrong, or absent o writing goes off topic, does not engage with course materials

● Things to consider about AI detectors:

o AI detectors flag any written text that bears hallmarks of AI (including text generated by software programs such as Microsoft Word, online document creators such as GoogleDocs, and web-based resources such as Grammarly)

o AI detectors are unreliable. No AI detector can provide definitive proof.检测器证据Detector evidence

o AI detectors are getting easier to evade (for example, a student can quickly paste AI- generated text into a paraphraser such as Quillbot) Research suggests that AI detectors are biased against non-native English speakers.

o CMC maintains an institutional license to Turnitin.com, which now includes AI detection.

Email Ben Royas in IT (Ben.Royas@ClaremontMcKenna.edu) to create your account. You should know that Turnitin recently acknowledged higher false positivity rates in some instances.

o If you plan to use detectors, it’s important to use them in consistent ways. Consider using them on everyone’s writing, or on a random sampling.

o You may also want to consult more than one AI detector for comparison, since they are likely to generate different results. Many AI detectors are free, but if you’d like to purchase a subscription, you may use your IFA.

Bringing cases to the Academic Standards Committee (ASC)

Sample Syllabus Language Whether or not you plan to limit the use of AI tools, it’s important to be clear with your students about your expectations. Given that AI technology, usage, and detection are evolving rapidly, we all need to stay flexible: any policy you write may become obsolete or be difficult (if not impossible) to enforce.

CMC’s Statement of Academic Integrity includes the following statement about electronic media use:

All rules and standards of academic integrity apply equally to all electronic media, particularly all intranet and internet activities. This is especially true for any form of plagiarism, ranging from submission of all or part of a paper obtained from an internet source to failure to cite properly an internet source.

Many of the resource links above include suggestions about syllabus language. Below are samples of syllabus language developed by members of the ChatGPT working group and the ASC.

SAMPLE 1 It is appropriate to use A.I. assistance only in those ways that it is appropriate to use human assistance (e.g., it’s ok to ask your friend to proofread your paper, making red-pen notes on your spelling and grammar, which you will then use to improve your paper, but it’s not ok to ask your friend to simply rewrite your paper for you).

SAMPLE 3 I expect all assignment submissions to reflect the result of your independent thinking. To avoid inadvertently appropriating the ideas of others, please do not discuss course assignments with classmates before you submit them. Generally, the assignments in this course are designed in a way that does not require you to consult outside sources (i.e. sources that are not part of your assigned readings).

Nevertheless, if you end up consulting any outside source while completing an assignment, you should always cite those sources to avoid plagiarism.

You are allowed to receive only two categories of help while completing an assignment:分级许可Tiered scale

• If you have questions about an assignment or need help completing it, please email me or visit me during office hours.

• If you receive help on your writing from any outside source including friends, tutors, or AI tools, you should acknowledge the nature and extent of the help in a separate note to be submitted along with the assignment If I see evidence of unacknowledged help received from others, misrepresentations about the nature of a submitted work, or unacknowledged use of sources that are not part of the required readings, I will refer the case to the Academic Standards Committee at CMC or the office that handles academic integrity matters at the student's home campus. For more on CMC's policies on academic integrity, see the College's Statement of Academic Integrity. If at any point you have questions about what is allowed or not allowed in this course, please contact me for clarifications.

SAMPLE 4 ChatGPT and similar AI technologies offer exciting possibilities for learning and discovery. They can serve as valuable tools in our academic pursuits, particularly for writing assistance and idea generation.

However, these tools must be used judiciously and ethically. This policy provides specific guidelines for the use of ChatGPT in this course.

Purposeful Usage: ChatGPT may be used as a tool for brainstorming, structuring thoughts, improving language, and enhancing understanding of complex concepts. However, the content generated by ChatGPT should not replace your own original thoughts and ideas.摘录Excerpt Instead, use it as a catalyst to spur your own creativity and critical thinking.

Attribution: If you incorporate text generated by ChatGPT into your assignments, you must appropriately attribute the source. Just as you would cite a book or website that you paraphrased or quoted, you should acknowledge the contribution of AI tools. Misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own original work constitutes plagiarism.违规定性Integrity framing

Citation of AI tools in academic writing is still a developing area, and traditional citation styles like MLA, APA, Chicago/Turabian have not yet established specific guidelines for AI-generated sources. However, based on current standards for citing online sources, we can make an approximation. Here is an example of how to cite an AI language tool, using ChatGPT as an example, in approximation for each style:

• MLA: OpenAI. “Title of Document or Topic of Discussion.” ChatGPT, Day Month Year of Acces.

• APA: OpenAI. (Year). Title of Document or Topic of Discussion. ChatGPT. URL (if applicable).

• Chicago/Turabian: OpenAI. “Title of Document or Topic of Discussion.” ChatGPT. Accessed Month Day, Year.

• Footnote format for Turabian: 1. OpenAI, “Title of Document or Topic of Discussion,” ChatGPT, accessed Month Day, Year.

Proportional Use: While ChatGPT can provide helpful input, your assignments should primarily showcase your own understanding, analysis, and creativity. Accordingly, direct content from AI tools (including ChatGPT) should comprise no more than 10% of your assignment.

Academic Integrity: Using ChatGPT to complete quizzes, exams, or any other assignment intended to test your individual understanding and skills is not permitted and will be considered a breach of academic integrity.

Responsible Use: ChatGPT responsibly and ethically. This includes respecting the guidelines and terms of service provided by OpenAI or any AI service provider, as well as treating the tool as an extension of the classroom learning environment.

Questions and Concerns: If you are uncertain about any aspect of this policy, or if you have questions about whether your intended use of ChatGPT aligns with these guidelines, I encourage you to speak with me before proceeding.

The use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can open up new avenues of exploration and learning. However, it's essential that we do so in a manner that respects the principles of academic integrity and the purpose of our course—to develop and express your own analytical and writing skills. Your understanding and compliance with this policy ensure a fair and productive learning environment for everyone.

Promoting Academic Integrity at CMC | Claremont McKenna College


Promoting Academic Integrity At CMC

At Claremont McKenna College every individual is expected to maintain high ethical standards in the pursuit of personal and professional goals at the College. As valued members of the scholarly community, students, faculty, and staff support an institutional commitment to honest intellectual inquiry and expect strict adherence to policies that uphold CMC’s academic integrity standards.

Tips for Students

Understand what academic dishonesty means.

Familiarize yourself with the

CMC Statement of Academic Integrity

. The

Claremont Colleges Library tutorial on academic integrity is a hands on module that lets you explore academic integrity.

Know what is expected by your professors.

Not sure what your professor expects of you? Ask! It’s important to know the instructor’s preferred citation style, policies on things like the use of calculators, and what level of collaboration is allowed in that class.课程规则优先Instructor override

Use online citation guides.

There are a lot of specifics to remember when citing your work. Take advantage of online resources to make sure you are following the guidelines.

Beware of using digital media, including photos and videos, in your personal and academic life.

If those images and videos were created by anyone other than you, they likely require permission知识产权IP & copyright

, and possibly payment, to use. This

Claremont Colleges Library resource can help.

Try an academic integrity checklist.

Checklists are a great way to avoid mistakes, including accidental transgressions, because they remind you of steps that should not be neglected.

Hold each other accountable.

If you have reason to believe that a fellow student has violated CMC’s Policy on Academic Integrity, you are encouraged to speak directly to the faculty member if you are comfortable doing so. Alternatively, you could speak directly to the student or report your suspicion anonymously.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • 研究者建议(非校方新增规则):高中课程逐项明确AI使用范围与披露方式;本人负责思考和核验;谨慎处理隐私及第三方作品。此建议不适用于推定该校本科招生许可。