← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.46 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.46 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Oxford

University of Oxford牛津大学英国UK

来源层级 · 校级通用Source level · University-wide 10 / 12 项有明文规定10 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · AI 明文仅见于研究生Admissions · Graduate programmes only

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Never present AI-generated text as your own work

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

10 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

交由教师决定Instructor decides, no default
When in doubt, ask your tutor or lecturer for clarification.

编码说明CODING NOTEStates no institution-wide fallback; when a policy is unclear, students are told to ask their tutor or lecturer.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
Each course and assessment may have different requirements. Always check the specific guidelines provided by your tutors, supervisors, department or faculty, and in your course handbook.

编码说明CODING NOTECourses and assessments set their own AI rules within University-wide rules (acknowledgement, summative-assessment policy, approved platforms).

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

非正式分类Informal categories主流口径MOST COMMON
Generative AI can be used in variety of ways to support learning. These include:

编码说明CODING NOTENames kinds of supportive use (cognition, organisation, skills practice) without a formal permission ladder.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

强制披露Required主流口径MOST COMMON
Any use of AI must be properly acknowledged according to your course requirements.

编码说明CODING NOTEAcknowledgement of any AI use, including paraphrasing or structural suggestions, is mandatory, per course rules.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

建议留证Recommended主流口径MOST COMMON
Keep records of prompts and interactions, especially when AI contributes to assessed work.

编码说明CODING NOTEGiven as a getting-started tip, not a stated mandatory requirement, to log prompts and interactions.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:建议留证(18/19)18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

学生对成品完全负责Student fully responsible
You remain fully responsible for any work submitted, including any errors or inaccuracies from AI assistance.

编码说明CODING NOTEStudents bear full accountability for submitted work, even where AI assistance introduced errors.

52 校中 10 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)10 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

学术不端Academic integrity violation主流口径MOST COMMON
Maintaining academic integrity and personal accountability

编码说明CODING NOTEUndisclosed or improper AI use is framed under academic integrity/accountability, not named as plagiarism specifically.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

禁止上传受限数据Restricted data prohibited主流口径MOST COMMON
Avoid sharing any personal or confidential research data with non-approved AI platforms

编码说明CODING NOTEPersonal or confidential research data must not go into AI platforms the University has not approved.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:禁止上传受限数据(20/31)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
The University's version of ChatGPT with data protection.

编码说明CODING NOTEChatGPT Edu is the University's own licensed deployment; SSO-based tools like it are the only ones approved for University data.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

明确以学习目标为据Explicit learning-objective rationale主流口径MOST COMMON
Consider whether using generative AI is causing you to bypass rather than augment your learning

编码说明CODING NOTEFrames the central risk as AI use bypassing, rather than augmenting, the student's own learning.

52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

提示词PromptsAI 输出内容AI output

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/46-Oxford.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status AI 明文仅核实于研究生/特定项目Explicit AI rules verified only for graduate or specific programmes

找到 Oxford 官方问答对「AI 创建申请材料」的答复,但明确只链接研究生申请指导;本科 UCAS 页面检索链接出现反爬阻断,因此没有核实 Oxford 本科 AI 专项限制。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 证据状态Evidence status graduate-only-ai
  • 采集说明Research acquisition source-specific ISO dates below (not publication dates).
  • 适用范围Scope 本科招生与个人陈述;研究生和在校生作业规则单独区分。

中文结论 / Findings

  • [X2-Q1] 已核查 AI 问答明确是 graduate applications;不移用于本科。
  • [S1] 本科 UCAS 网页旧抓取 403「Just a moment」;第二个本科 personal statement URL 亦 403,不能从阻断页面作出具体 AI 规则断言。
  • 本科申请应复核 Oxford 最新官方申请材料;另见已收录的UCAS平台指导,其规则不等于 Oxford 自有规定。

Official sources and short original excerpts

[X2] Oxford Support / Can I use AI to create my application documents?

[X2-Q1] 仅研究生

Guidance on the appropriate use of AI in graduate applications is available in our Application Guide.

[S1] Oxford / UCAS application

Limitations

  • Oxford 本科官方主站两次正常 GET 呈挑战页,无法核验内容;无 Oxford 本科 AI 明文证据。
  • 现有 FAQ 来源 scope 为 graduate-only,即使导航包含 Undergraduate Admissions 也不能当本科规则。

High-school adaptation (researcher recommendation; not university policy)

  • 每项课程、项目或评估先查教师书面规则;文书由申请人真实反思并亲自核对事实。
  • 明确区分可用于构思或校对、可提交的内容与不可在面试/评估使用的工具;勿将大学在校作业规则照搬入高中或本科申请。

Shared system boundary

另见UCAS平台AI指导。该文是共享平台材料,不能当作本校独立政策,也不能覆盖校方更具体的要求。

官方原文The official text

univ/46-Oxford.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 来源层级Source level校级通用 —— 中央或教务层级、面向全校学生的政策University-wide — a central or provost-level policy that applies to all students
  • 抽取审计Extraction audit轻微修正(审计员修正 2 处)Minor corrections (2 corrections by the auditor)
  • 官方来源Official sourceUniversity of Oxford
    https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-guides/getting-started-with-ai-for-students
  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [AI Competency Centre / Getting started with AI for students] University of Oxford — scope: university-students; authority: official-student-guidance.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

AI Competency Centre / Getting started with AI for students


Getting started with AI for students

Note:

Students must refer to the University’s

Guidance on safe and responsible use of GenAI tools for study. You should always follow the advice and guidance of your tutors and/or supervisors, and consult your department or faculty in relation to ethical use.

The role of generative AI in learning

Generative AI can be used in variety of ways to support learning. These include:分级许可Tiered scale

Supporting cognition:

For example, by helping break down complex concepts or materials or making visual or audio versions of materials.

Supporting organisation:

For example, by organising notes or creating actionable learning plans.

Supporting skills practice:

For example, by creating supporting tools such as custom bots to assist with practice activities.

What you should know about generative AI before starting

Before you start, make sure you:

Understand the general strengths and limitations of generative AI tools

Get to know the specific tool you are using

Consider whether using generative AI is causing you to bypass rather than augment your learning学习理由Learning rationale

Important:

Generative AI tools are unlike traditional software. You are not just learning the features and interface but also a whole new mode of interaction. Make sure you spend enough time learning about how they work before you start relying on them.

The outputs they produce may contain critical errors, so build in processes for reviewing them critically and checking their accuracy.

Policy and guidance

The University of Oxford supports the responsible use of generative AI to enhance learning while maintaining academic standards. Clear policies ensure AI tools support rather than undermine educational goals.

Students must understand and follow the guidance on safe and responsible use of GenAI tools

. Each course and assessment may have different requirements. Always check the specific guidelines provided by your tutors, supervisors, department or faculty, and in your course handbook.课程规则优先Instructor override

Key principles include:

Transparency about any AI use in academic work

Following

AI use in summative assessment policies without exception

Maintaining academic integrity and personal accountability违规定性Integrity framing

Developing authentic understanding alongside AI assistance

When using AI tools with University data, always follow information security guidelines and use only approved platforms when working with confidential or sensitive information.

Capabilities and limitations

Critical limitations

Large Language Models (LLMs) have limitations that should always be kept in mind if you are using them to support learning. For example, LLMs do not:

Give exactly the same response every time

Always provide reliable facts, figures or quotations

Perform reliable calculations on numbers

Report accurately on their internal processes

Remember, anything generated by AI must be treated as a first draft to be checked or a hypothesis to be tested. Never assume that because AI performs well on one task, it will work equally well on a task that seems very similar.

Hallucination risk:

AI tools generate plausible text that often includes accurate information but can also contain complete fabrications. This is particularly common with:

Numbers, dates, and statistics

References and quotations

Specific facts about people

Claims about what the AI has generated itself

Academic citations and page numbers

Privacy considerations:

Be cautious about information shared with AI tools. Always:

Check privacy policies and opt-out options

Use University-approved tools for work or study related activity

Avoid sharing any personal or confidential research data with non-approved AI platforms数据与隐私Data & privacy

Remember that free versions you access without your University SSO ( abcd1234@ox.ac.uk

) may use your data for training AI models.

Verification and iteration:

Don't accept the first result; iterate and ask for improvements.

Don't assume that one experience is enough to understand how AI works.

Don't expect to be able to predict quality of the response based on the last time you tried something similar.

If a conversation goes off the rails, abandon it and start over in a new one.

Treat everything you get from AI as a first draft or a hypothesis to be tested.

Never trust an AI tool when it tells you about how it achieved a result.

Always check any number, quote, name or date generated by AI.

Many AI tools such as ChatGPT now include ‘search’ functions. Don’t assume that the search results are comprehensive, or that everything on the retrieved pages is accurately quoted or includes the necessary context.

Do not assume that internet search results are the best sources of information on a particular subject.

Understanding hallucination

The only thing generative AI does is produce plausible text. This often includes accurate information but it can just as easily be completely fictitious. This is called hallucination.

AI tools can hallucinate anything at any time in an extremely plausible way. Hallucinated text is often mixed with perfectly accurate information. Common hallucinations include:

Numbers, facts and figures

References and exact quotes

Suggestions about what the AI itself did

Tips for getting started

Begin with low-stakes practice

: Use AI for note organisation or study planning before applying it to assessed work.

Document your process

: Keep records of prompts and interactions, especially when AI contributes to assessed work.过程留证Process evidence

The key to successful AI use in learning lies not in replacing your own understanding, but in enhancing your ability to engage with complex materials while demonstrating academic integrity and developing critical thinking skills.

University-supported platforms

These tools can be accessed securely using your SSO email ( abcd1234@ox.ac.uk

) to log in. These are the only tools which have been approved for use with University data.

ChatGPT Edu

: The University's version of ChatGPT with data protection.机构工具Institutional tools Features include voice interaction, canvas for live text collaboration, and Study Mode for exploring academic concepts. You can create custom GPTs for specific learning tasks or subjects.

Google Gemini

: Google’s chatbot, powered by Google’s Gemini language models. The University-supported account you can access with your SSO ( abcd1234@ox.ac.uk

) has equivalent features to the free/public version but offers enhanced data security. You may want to explore using this for summarising videos or creating applets.

Gemini Notebook:

Google’s notebook, powered by Gemini models. You can log into this with your SSO ( abcd1234@ox.ac.uk

) to collect multiple documents, make your own notes about them, or combine those with AI-generated insights. Where appropriate, you could also explore using them to create study aids such as mind maps, flashcards, quizzes, and even audio podcasts or video summaries.

Microsoft Copilot Chat

: Microsoft’s standalone chatbot, powered by GPT models from OpenAI, is a limited alternative to ChatGPT, offered for free by Microsoft. You should login with your SSO ( abcd1234@ox.ac.uk

) for enhanced data security. Note: The free version of Copilot Chat does not offer integration with Microsoft Office apps.

Note:

Make sure you are familiar with the possible limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) before considering using them in your studies. You should always follow the advice and guidance of your tutors and/or supervisors, and consult your department or faculty in relation to ethical use.

Important caveats:

AI may subtly change meaning when rephrasing

Not all suggestions will be appropriate for your context

Always maintain your own voice and understanding

Never present AI-generated text as your own work摘录Excerpt

Responsible use principles

Core academic integrity

Never present AI work as your own

: Any use of AI must be properly acknowledged according to your course requirements.披露要求Disclosure This includes paraphrased content, structural suggestions, and generated examples.

Follow assessment guidelines

: Always check and strictly follow the AI use policy for each assignment. When in doubt, ask your tutor or lecturer for clarification.默认规则Default rule

Maintain accountability

: You remain fully responsible for any work submitted, including any errors or inaccuracies from AI assistance.核实责任Verification duty

Subject-specific resources

: Many departments offer discipline-specific guidance on using AI. Appropriate use of AI varies in different departments and on different courses. Check your department's website for advice and if you are an Oxford student, ask your tutor or supervisor about available resources.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • 每项课程、项目或评估先查教师书面规则;文书由申请人真实反思并亲自核对事实。
  • 明确区分可用于构思或校对、可提交的内容与不可在面试/评估使用的工具;勿将大学在校作业规则照搬入高中或本科申请。