← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.45 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.45 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

HKU

The University of Hong Kong香港大学中国香港Hong Kong

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 4 / 12 项有明文规定4 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 未取得可核实指导Admissions · No verifiable guidance

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

AI should be used to support, not replace, traditional teaching methods.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

4 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

依课程而定Course dependent
provide guidance on proper declaration and citation of GenAI tools used in coursework tasks and assignments

编码说明CODING NOTETeachers set course-specific expectations for declaring and citing GenAI tools used in coursework.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
Users need to ask questions, challenge assumptions, and seek out additional information when using AI.

编码说明CODING NOTETALIC (non-binding faculty guidance) instructs users to question and check AI output against other sources.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 8 所同样未作表述8 of 52 are likewise silent

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
a wide range of GenAI tools such as Microsoft OpenAI and Dall-E will be provided for free to all teachers and students for teaching and learning purposes

编码说明CODING NOTEHKU provides GenAI tools free to all teachers and students for teaching and learning.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

一般性表述General statement
By developing core principles, educators can ensure that AI is used to enhance learning.

编码说明CODING NOTEAI is to enhance learning; no statement that it must not bypass the skills being assessed.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

工具名称Tool name正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/45-HKU.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 未取得可核实的适用指导No verifiable applicable guidance obtained

HKU国际资格本科申请页将个人陈述列为审阅材料;已查公开招生页未核实个人陈述中AI使用的专项规则。教学用GenAI政策不等同招生许可。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • Status: no-verified-guidance (see scope of each source; not a blanket university-wide rule).
  • 中文结论:HKU国际资格本科申请页将个人陈述列为审阅材料;已查公开招生页未核实个人陈述中AI使用的专项规则。教学用GenAI政策不等同招生许可。
  • 原文引句与中文概述分开;原文来自保存的官方正文,经空白归一化对照。检索未发现规定不意味着允许使用。

[X1] International Qualifications

[X1-Q1] holistic review

Admissions decisions to the University's undergraduate degree programmes are made based on academic performance as well as other factors, including interview performance, personal statement, references, other documents submitted to the University, etc. Satisfying the minimum requirements does not guarantee admissions.

[S1] HKU Undergraduate Admissions

  • 发布单位Publisher HKU Undergraduate Admissions
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate admissions landing page / official-admissions-landing
  • 官方链接Official URL https://admissions.hku.hk/
  • 最终页面地址Final URL https://admissions.hku.hk/
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated; accessed: 2026-09-26T02:20:31.707448+00:00
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-visible-text; HTTP 200; saved body: sources/45-HKU-S1.txt
申请AI专项检索记录 / Admissions AI searches

检索结果只能用于发现线索;不能以检索未命中断言不存在政策。

  • site:admissions.hku.hk "generative AI" "personal statement" — Google HTTP 200 but rendered related-query/navigation links only; no reliable official result extractable from returned HTML. Separately reviewed saved official undergraduate bodies; no verified AI-specific rule from this search alone.
  • site:admissions.hku.hk "ChatGPT" "application" — Google HTTP 200 but rendered related-query/navigation links only; no reliable official result extractable from returned HTML. Separately reviewed saved official undergraduate bodies; no verified AI-specific rule from this search alone.
  • site:admissions.hku.hk "authentic" "personal statement" — Google HTTP 200 but rendered related-query/navigation links only; no reliable official result extractable from returned HTML. Separately reviewed saved official undergraduate bodies; no verified AI-specific rule from this search alone.

适用边界 / Gaps

  • 入学申请和入学后的课程作业是不同场景;未核实的AI规则不作许可。

官方原文The official text

univ/45-HKU.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [HKU introduces new policy to fully integrate GenAI in Teaching and Learning] HKU Lead / HKU communications — scope: university / teaching and learning; authority: official-policy-announcement. [AI Literacy: HKU GenAI Policy] HKU Libraries — scope: university / student/staff resource directory; authority: official-resource-directory. [Teaching and Learning / Core Principles] HKU TALIC AI in Education — scope: teaching resource; not binding student rule; authority: official-faculty-guidance.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

HKU introduces new policy to fully integrate GenAI in Teaching and Learning


HKU introduces new policy to fully integrate GenAI in Teaching and Learning

The University of Hong Kong (HKU) has announced its commitment to incorporating next-generation artificial intelligence technology, GenAI, into its teaching and learning environment starting from the 2023-24 academic year.

In June, the University Senate endorsed a comprehensive policy for using GenAI in teaching and learning. This incorporation of GenAI will establish it as the fifth literacy for HKU students, alongside the current four literacies of oral, written, visual, and digital communication, under the HKU communication-intensive course (CiC) initiative.

Over the past several months, HKU has offered free access to ChatGPT and other generative AI tools for teaching staff. Beginning this new semester in September, a wide range of GenAI tools such as Microsoft OpenAI and Dall-E will be provided for free to all teachers and students for teaching and learning purposes机构工具Institutional tools. Trainings and online courses and other resources will be provided to ensure the effective use of these tools.

"HKU embraces GenAI and recognizes AI literacy as essential to teaching and learning. Our goal is to enable our teachers and students to become not only AI literate but also leaders in exploiting the vast potential of GenAI for the benefit of mankind," said Professor Ian Holliday, Vice-President and Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning), who earlier led the task force to formulate the policy paper. He will chair a new GenAI User Advisory Committee to oversee the integration of GenAI in teaching and learning, and determine which GenAI tools should be incorporated and how they can best support student learning.

Under the new policy, teachers are encouraged to optimise student learning with GenAI including devising creative, engaging and innovative T&L activities; fostering analytical thinking; developing critical research skills; creating content tailored to individual needs and interests, etc.

To maintain the highest standards of GenAI integration, periodic evaluations involving multiple stakeholders, such as teachers, students, and IT administrators, will be conducted. These evaluations will inform future strategies and tactics to address any emerging challenges.

Teachers are encouraged to embrace GenAI in assessment, and to devise mechanisms for evaluate student attainment authentically and fairly. The aim is to ensure the responsible and effective use of GenAI tools, and to uphold the highest standard of academic integrity.

To address the challenges posed by GenAI on student work assessments, teachers are to clearly communicate expectations and provide guidance on proper declaration and citation of GenAI tools used in coursework tasks and assignments披露要求Disclosure. Alternative assessment methods will be encouraged, prompting students to use GenAI tools in their submitted work. Examples include device-free examinations, oral examinations, live classwork such as demonstrations and presentations, and student peer assessments.

Additional resources for students and staff in need of AI support, including the AI Clinic, AI in Education website, and a five-week self-paced online module, will serve as valuable sources of information and guidance on responsible AI use.

“By boosting critical engagement with GenAI, we aim to elevate teaching and learning at the University to new heights of academic excellence.” Professor Holliday said.

AI Literacy: HKU GenAI Policy


What is AI Literacy?

Referring to

HKU Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Teaching and Learning

,

AI literacy comprises the ability to comprehend, use, interact with, and make informed decisions regarding AI technology in daily life. It involves understanding the basic principles of AI, recognising its applications, and being aware of ethical, social, and privacy implications while responsibly engaging with AI systems.

This guide with curated learning resources aims to help HKU students and staff 1) deepen their understanding of AI, 2) learn about some Generative AI (GenAI) tools or AI-empowered tools that can enhance their learning and research experience, and 3) make individual decisions on selecting appropriate AI tools based on their own learning and research needs.

HKU GenAI Policy

HKU introduces new policy to fully integrate GenAI in teaching and learning

01 Aug 2023

The University of Hong Kong (HKU) is embracing generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, in teaching and learning to actively enhance students' cognitive abilities and application skills. The University will provide resources and support, enabling staff and students to not only be users of GenAI but also pioneers in exploring its potential applications.

You may log in with your HKU email account to see the details in the policy document:

HKU Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Teaching and Learning (2023)

.

GenAI in Research Guidelines

Guidelines on the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Research at The University of Hong Kong by HKU Research Integrity Sub-Committee (Sep 2025)

Ethical Use of AI

Guidance for Ethical Use of AI by HKU Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (

22 Aug 2025)

HKU-Licensed AI Tools

General Research Support

HKU GenAI

Microsoft 365 Copilot

Getting Started with a Research Topic

Primo Research Assistant

Scite AI

Literature Discovery and Review

LeapSpace

Consensus

Explore AI-powered tools integrated into HKU Libraries' subscribed databases at

AI Features in Library Databases

Teaching and Learning / Core Principles


Core Principles on the Use of AI for

Teaching and Learning

Core Principles on the Use of AI for

Teaching and Learning

Core Principles on the Use of AI for Teaching and Learning

The development of core principles on the use of AI for teaching and learning is essential to ensure that this technology is used in an effective and responsible way. AI has the potential to revolutionize education, but it can also be used in ways that harm students and reinforce inequality. By developing core principles, educators can ensure that AI is used to enhance learning.学习理由Learning rationale These principles can also ensure the use of AI is transparent and accountable.

1. Access

AI should be accessible to all learners regardless of their background and abilities. This means that efforts should be made to ensure that AI tools and resources are available and affordable to everyone, and that they are designed in a way that is easy to use and understand.

2. Security

AI systems should be designed with security in mind, with appropriate measures in place to protect data and prevent unauthorized access or misuse. This includes ensuring that user data is encrypted and stored securely, and that access to AI systems is restricted to authorized users only.

3. Integrity

Teachers can establish guidelines and policies that require students to disclose the use of generative AI in their work. Additionally, teachers can employ plagiarism detection software that is capable of detecting content generated by AI, and educate students on the importance of maintaining ethical standards in scholarship.

4. Literacy

People need effectively collaborate with AI and critically evaluate AI. AI competencies are needed to effectively and ethically transform the way that we work, teach and study. Users need to ask questions, challenge assumptions, and seek out additional information when using AI.核实责任Verification duty

5. Pedagogy

AI should be used to support, not replace, traditional teaching methods.摘录Excerpt This means that AI systems should be designed to complement existing teaching methods, and that they should be used in conjunction with other teaching resources and strategies.

6. Assessment

AI technologies could be introduced to support the assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes. In other words, AIs could help teachers to identify areas where learners may need additional support or resources. Meanwhile, teachers could design authenatic assessments that could not be answered by AIs directly.