← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.34 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.34 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Pomona

Pomona College波莫纳学院

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 6 / 12 项有明文规定6 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 仅本人写作/真实性要求Admissions · Authenticity requirement only

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

If generative AI tools play a significant role in the genesis of your work, they should be credited in the same way that you would share authorship with a collaborating lab partner in a publication.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

6 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

默认禁止Prohibited by default主流口径MOST COMMON
students never intentionally represent the ideas or the language of others as their own, examples include but are not limited to plagiarism, failing to use citations, unapproved use of artificial intelligence

编码说明CODING NOTEUniversity-wide standard lists unapproved AI use as a violation; CS courses instead get an assigned tier, so blanket silence rarely arises there.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
If a student uses AI in a way that does not align with the tier system for a specific course, it is considered a violation of our Departmental

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructors/courses operate within the department's four-tier framework; deviating from it is itself a policy violation.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

明确分级框架Explicit named scale
This document outlines the four tiers of allowed use that a course can fall under, from least to most permissive:

编码说明CODING NOTEFour numbered tiers (0-3) run from no AI use to fully open use; each CS course is assigned one tier.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)5 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

依课程而定Course dependent
If generative AI tools play a significant role in the genesis of your work, they should be credited in the same way that you would share authorship with a collaborating lab partner in a publication.

编码说明CODING NOTEAttribution is required only under Tier 2; Tier 3 explicitly waives credit, Tier 0 bars AI, Tier 1 defers to the syllabus.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 14 所同样未作表述14 of 52 are likewise silent

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

学术不端Academic integrity violation主流口径MOST COMMON
students never intentionally represent the ideas or the language of others as their own, examples include but are not limited to plagiarism, failing to use citations, unapproved use of artificial intelligence

编码说明CODING NOTEUnapproved AI use is listed among the enumerated Standards for Academic Integrity, alongside but not identical to plagiarism.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 21 所同样未作表述21 of 52 are likewise silent

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 28 所同样未作表述28 of 52 are likewise silent

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

一般性表述General statement
instructors who primarily want to curb AI use but may make exceptions tailored to their course's learning objectives

编码说明CODING NOTETier 1 ties any instructor exceptions to the course's own learning objectives, an explicit learning-based justification.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

该校的分级框架Its permission levels

  1. Tier 0: Absolutely no usage allowed
  2. Tier 1: See syllabus for allowed usage
  3. Tier 2: Use in any way with required attribution
  4. Tier 3: Completely open use

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/34-Pomona.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科本人写作/真实性要求(未证实细化 AI 边界)Own-work and authenticity requirements; no detailed AI boundaries verified

招生页面鼓励真实呈现自己,文书看重个人声音;已读取的两处本科页面未出现 AI 专项允许/禁止或披露规范,故只能归类为真实性建议。[S1][S2]

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • Research review: 2026-09-26 Asia/Shanghai; acquisition timestamps are listed per source (UTC).
  • Evidence status: authenticity-only
  • Scope: Undergraduate admissions only; do not infer admissions requirements from course rules.
  • Original snapshots were reused without changing original acquisition times. Blocked/empty pages remain marked as such.

中文结论 / Findings

招生页面鼓励真实呈现自己,文书看重个人声音;已读取的两处本科页面未出现 AI 专项允许/禁止或披露规范,故只能归类为真实性建议。[S1][S2]

Official sources and selected original text

[S1] Applying to Pomona

  • 发布单位Publisher Pomona College Admissions
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.pomona.edu/admissions/apply
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate admissions / official-admissions-advice
  • 发布日期Publication date Not stated
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-visible-text; acquired 2026-09-26T02:18:47.029311+00:00

[S1-Q1]

We encourage you to use your application to present yourself authentically by sharing with us what activities mean the most to you, what goals motivate you and what ideas get you excited.

[S1-Q2]

We look not just for strong writing, but for individual voice, passion and thoughtfulness.

[S2] Paths to Apply

  • 发布单位Publisher Pomona College Admissions
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.pomona.edu/admissions/paths-apply
  • 范围/性质Scope / authority undergraduate admissions / official-application-instructions
  • 发布日期Publication date Not stated
  • 采集方式Retrieval full-visible-text; acquired 2026-09-26T02:18:47.031488+00:00

Evidence boundaries

  • 两处已读取的招生网页不含 AI 专项规则;不能据此证明其他页面或将来申请季没有规则。
  • 其中页面出现 Fall 2026 prompts,不代表未来录取周期。
Negative search record

Three varied official-domain admissions / essay / AI searches were attempted; Google HTML responses exposed no parseable results, so they are inconclusive, not proof of absence. Subsequent web-search provider calls hit HTTP 432 quota. See branch search log.

官方原文The official text

univ/34-Pomona.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Academic Honesty] Pomona College Student Handbook — scope: college-wide student policy; authority: policy. [Computer Science AI Policy Tier System] Pomona Computer Science Department — scope: department-specific; pilot Fall 2026; authority: department policy/pilot.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Academic Honesty


Standards for Academic Integrity

The College expects students to understand and adhere to basic standards of honesty and academic integrity. These standards include but are not limited to the following:

In projects and assignments (including homework) prepared independently, students never intentionally represent the ideas or the language of others as their own, examples include but are not limited to plagiarism, failing to use citations, unapproved use of artificial intelligence默认规则Default rule违规定性Integrity framing and resubmitted personal work for another course.

Students do not destroy or alter either the work of other students or the educational resources and materials of the College.

Students neither give nor receive assistance with examinations.

Students do not represent work completed for one course as original work for another or deliberately disregard course rules and regulations.

In laboratory or research projects involving the collection of data, students accurately report data observed and do not alter nor fabricate data for any reason

Sanctions

When assigning sanctions, the hearing panel shall consider the severity of the offense, precedent, the attitude of the respondent, the respondent’s previous academic conduct record, and the conditions under which the offense was committed.

Sanctions that may be imposed include, but are not limited to:

Academic Sanctions:

Lower grade on an assignment

Loss of credit on an assignment

“F” on an assignment

“F” in the course

Assignment of make-up or additional work

Other Sanctions:

Suspension from the College

Loss of College honors (ex. summa cum laude)

Expulsion from the College

Reporting of Policy Violations and Sanctions

Beginning with students who enroll at Pomona College in Fall 2026, all policy violations and sanctions, that are not suspension or expulsion, will be reportable to employers, graduate and professional schools and other appropriate entities with the student’s knowledge for 3 years from the student’s graduation date.

For students who enrolled at Pomona College prior to Fall 2026, policy violations and sanctions of students will remain reportable to employers, graduate and professional schools and other appropriate entities with the student’s knowledge for 5 years from the date the student is notified of the outcome of their case.

Computer Science AI Policy Tier System


Computer Science AI Policy Tier System

Purpose of this document:

To provide a unified system and increase clarity about what AI usages are allowed or disallowed across all Pomona Computer Science classes. This is a program we are piloting in Fall 2026; we plan to revisit it regularly.

Because these technologies are advancing so rapidly, the document focuses on general usage rather than specific tools (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grammarly, etc.).

Acknowledgments:

We have been inspired by HMC’s AI-Use Course Policy.

Usage guide:

This document outlines the four tiers of allowed use that a course can fall under, from least to most permissive:分级许可Tiered scale

  1. Absolutely no usage allowed
  1. See the syllabus for allowed usage
  1. Use in any way with required attribution
  1. Completely open use

If a student uses AI in a way that does not align with the tier system for a specific course, it is considered a violation of our Departmental课程规则优先Instructor override

Academic Honor Policy

.

Tier 0: Absolutely no usage allowed

Courses in this tier do not allow the use of any AI. Disallowed uses include, but are not limited to, using generative AI tools to brainstorm ideas, find source materials, summarize ideas, create study guides, generate code snippets, images, or videos, revise your writing, or check your work. Tools that automatically flag spelling and grammatical errors as you write are allowed (for example, the spelling and grammar checkers built into Microsoft Word), but not tools that offer suggested revisions of your sentences (for example, Grammarly). If English is not your first language, please ask your instructor about whether tools for translating words or texts between languages are allowed.

Tier 1: See syllabus for allowed usage

The goal of this policy is to allow some flexibility for instructors who primarily want to curb AI use but may make exceptions tailored to their course's learning objectives学习理由Learning rationale. For example, a course following this tier might allow the use of AI for study purposes (e.g., to ask clarifying questions, obtain additional examples, create study guides, etc.) but prohibit its use during the completion of assignments and exams. Rather than provide an exhaustive list, students must read the course syllabus carefully and discuss allowed uses with their instructor.

Tier 2: Use in any way with required attribution

The goal of this policy is to openly allow students to use generative AI tools in their learning. If generative AI tools play a significant role in the genesis of your work, they should be credited in the same way that you would share authorship with a collaborating lab partner in a publication.披露要求Disclosure摘录Excerpt The course syllabus will contain more information on expectations and attribution formatting.

Tier 3: Completely open use

Students can freely use generative AI tools and do not need to credit their use. Specifically and only for classes in Tier 3, text and images generated by a student using an AI system are treated as the student's own work for the purposes of the College Academic Honesty Policy.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • Ask for assignment-specific AI permission and distinguish brainstorming, drafting, attribution and independent verification.
  • Keep course-specific requirements separate from campus-wide academic-integrity standards and separate again from admissions instructions.