← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.35 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.35 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Boston University

Boston University波士顿大学

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 11 / 12 项有明文规定11 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-09-26Accessed 2026-09-26 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

Use AI to assist—not replace—your work.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

11 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

交由教师决定Instructor decides, no default
Clarify your instructor’s policy before starting your assignment.

编码说明CODING NOTEFaculty set each course policy in the syllabus; students are told to clarify the instructor’s policy first.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
Misuse of GenAI can lead to violations of the university’s academic conduct policies.

编码说明CODING NOTEInstructors set course-specific acceptable-use rules, but misuse still falls under BU's university-wide academic conduct policy.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

非正式分类Informal categories主流口径MOST COMMON
Make clear distinctions between acceptable and unacceptable uses.

编码说明CODING NOTEDistinguishes acceptable from unacceptable uses without a formal numbered or color-coded permission ladder.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

强制披露Required主流口径MOST COMMON
Cite AI-generated material to ensure transparency.

编码说明CODING NOTELibrary guidance directs students to cite AI-generated material for transparency, following citation-style and instructor rules.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

建议留证Recommended主流口径MOST COMMON
Providing a transcript of AI interactions

编码说明CODING NOTELibrary tips suggest including prompts in an appendix or providing an AI-interaction transcript, per instructor requirements.

52 校中 18 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:建议留证(18/19)18 of 52 take this position · most common: Recommended (18/19)

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

须自行核实Verification required主流口径MOST COMMON
They are responsible for verifying the accuracy of any AI-generated content.

编码说明CODING NOTEStudents are told they are responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-generated content they use.

52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

明确等同抄袭Explicitly plagiarism
Submitting GenAI-generated work as their own original work may constitute plagiarism.

编码说明CODING NOTESubmitting GenAI output as one's own original work is explicitly framed as potentially constituting plagiarism.

52 校中 13 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)13 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

质疑其可靠性Reliability questioned
all detection tools are highly fallible, both with respect to false positives and false negatives

编码说明CODING NOTEFaculty guidance warns that GenAI-detection tools are highly fallible (false positives and negatives) and cautions against relying on them.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:不得作为唯一或主要证据(8/14)5 of 52 take this position · most common: Not sole or primary evidence (8/14)

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

禁止上传受限数据Restricted data prohibited主流口径MOST COMMON
Note that it is not approved for use with restricted use data

编码说明CODING NOTETerrierGPT, BU's licensed AI platform, is approved up to confidential data but explicitly not approved for restricted-use data.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:禁止上传受限数据(20/31)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

提供机构版工具Institution-provided tool主流口径MOST COMMON
all BU students and faculty have free access

编码说明CODING NOTETerrierGPT is BU's own GenAI platform, free to all BU students and faculty, with added data-security protections.

52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

一般性表述General statement
Use AI to assist—not replace—your work.

编码说明CODING NOTEAI should assist rather than replace the student’s own work.

52 校中 15 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)15 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

提示词PromptsAI 输出内容AI output使用范围与程度Extent of use正式引注Formal citation

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/35-Boston-University.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界(效力见来源)Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

BU 招生页明确把 AI 作为辅助原创想法的工具,不能用它完整写出申请文书;同时强调申请人要遵守学术诚实标准。与在校课程规范分开。[S1-Q1][S1-Q2]

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 检索日期Research date 2026-09-26 (Asia/Shanghai); individual original snapshot retrieval dates below.
  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai (evidence category, not a permission rating).
  • 格式说明Format brief original English excerpts from saved official source bodies; whitespace normalized, wording preserved. Chinese findings and adaptations below are research interpretation, not quotations.

中文结论(研究解读,非学校原文)

BU 招生页明确把 AI 作为辅助原创想法的工具,不能用它完整写出申请文书;同时强调申请人要遵守学术诚实标准。与在校课程规范分开。[S1-Q1][S1-Q2]

Official sources and exact excerpts

[S1] How to apply — Statement on Generative AI

  • 发布单位Publisher Boston University Board of Admissions
  • 官方链接Official URL https://www.bu.edu/admissions/apply/
  • 来源日期Source date Not stated
  • 适用范围Scope first-year and undergraduate applicants
  • 来源性质Authority official-admissions-guidance
  • 采集时间Retrieved 2026-09-26T02:16:42.796953+00:00 (original acquisition); full-text

[S1-Q1] AI supports original ideas but not whole essay

If you opt to use these tools at any point while writing your essays, they should only be used to support your original ideas rather than to write your essays in their entirety.

[S1-Q2] Credit others

When representing the words or ideas of another in their original work, students should properly credit the source.

边界与尚未核实

  • 招生页面没有逐项规定翻译、语法润色、透露使用记录、检测器或统一处分;不得补推。
  • 未逐项核实的细节不可视为默认许可;本页无招生/课堂之间的相互授权。

申请材料使用提醒(研究者建议,非学校原文)

先核对当季官方招生说明与适用的申请平台条款;保持本人经历、观点与最终写作的真实归属,记录使用过程;不可凭课堂准用规则推定申请准用。

官方原文The official text

univ/35-Boston-University.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-26
  • 格式说明Format note Relevant passages copied verbatim from saved copies of the official pages below; navigation and unrelated page content removed. Wording is retained; layout may differ from the webpage.
  • 适用范围Scope note [Generative AI Guidelines for Classroom Use] BU AI Development Accelerator — scope: faculty classroom guidance; impacts enrolled students; authority: official-teaching-guidance. [Generative AI Tools for Students: AI Tools for Coursework] Boston University Libraries — scope: students, course work; authority: official-student-guidance.
  • 用途说明Use note Source material for comparison, not a translation or the school's final high-school policy.

Generative AI Guidelines for Classroom Use


Generative AI Guidelines for Classroom Use

With students having easy access to generative AI (GenAI) tools, BU faculty must proactively guide appropriate and ethical use in coursework. Without such guidance, students may use these tools for help with studying and on homework assignments in ways that unintentionally violate academic integrity standards. It is therefore important for faculty to review what constitutes allowable versus misuse of GenAI in their course.

AIDA Leadership offers the following recommendations:

Clarify GenAI Expectations Early

Explore our

AI usage sample syllabi and policies page

, submitted by BU faculty.

State your policy on GenAI use explicitly in the course syllabus. This includes disclosing how the instructors (faculty and student teachers) will use GenAI for lecture preparation, presentations, grading, and other course related tasks.

Take time in the first week of class to explain your policy and its rationale.

Make clear distinctions between acceptable and unacceptable uses.分级许可Tiered scale

Reinforce Student Responsibility

Students should be made aware that:

They are responsible for verifying the accuracy of any AI-generated content.核实责任Verification duty

Submitting GenAI-generated work as their own original work may constitute plagiarism.违规定性Integrity framing

Misuse of GenAI can lead to violations of the university’s academic conduct policies.课程规则优先Instructor override

Encourage Constructive Use

When appropriate, faculty are encouraged to:

Design assignments that integrate GenAI in a way that enhances learning, such as using it for brainstorming, editing, or reflection exercises.

Emphasize learning goals over performance metrics, which can help reduce misuse.

Consider process-focused assignments and assessing intermediate milestones towards a final product (e.g., topics to be covered, drafts, revisions, reflections, peer reviews) that even when produced with help from GenAI, they reinforce a way of working towards a final product.

Academic Misconduct and Detection Limits

Be very cautious with accusations of GenAI misuse—all detection tools are highly fallible, both with respect to false positives and false negatives检测器证据Detector evidence, despite the marketing claims of companies that sell these products.

Apply enforcement policies uniformly to minimize bias. And recognize that even a uniform policy cannot eliminate bias — those students who are digitally savvy are more likely to evade detection, and those who are less knowledgeable are more likely to end up in the dragnet.

Focus on teaching students how to ethically and thoughtfully engage with GenAI, rather than only punishing misuse.

Support and Resources

Consider issues of equity, access, and security when promoting GenAI usage in your courses. If at all possible, create assignments on the

TerrierGPT platform

, to which all BU students and faculty have free access机构工具Institutional tools. This has the additional benefit of providing a high level of data security, up through confidential data

. (Note that it is not approved for use with restricted use data数据与隐私Data & privacy

).

For policies on GenAI use in broader academic and research contexts, please refer to:

Generative AI Guidelines for Faculty & Staff

.

Generative AI Tools for Students: AI Tools for Coursework


AI Tools for Coursework

Tips for Discussing AI With Your Instructor

Ask Early:

Clarify your instructor’s policy before starting your assignment.默认规则Default rule

Be Specific:

Explain how you plan to use AI (e.g., brainstorming, summarizing, generating/editing content). Some uses may be allowed while others are restricted.

Plan for Attribution:

Credit AI use properly. Use APA, MLA, or Chicago styles, and follow any additional instructor requirements, such as:

Including prompts in an appendix

Providing a transcript of AI interactions过程留证Process evidence

See the

Citing Generative AI section for detailed citation guidance.

Academic Integrity

Maintaining Integrity in the Age of AI

Academic integrity means honesty and ethical behavior in all academic work:

Don’t cheat or submit work you didn’t create.

Avoid plagiarism by properly crediting others’ ideas.

At BU, all students must follow the

Academic Conduct Code

. Learn more via the

Academic Integrity at BU page or the library’s

Citing Your Sources guide.

Using AI Ethically

Don’t present AI-generated content as your own.

Use AI to assist—not replace—your work.学习理由Learning rationale摘录Excerpt

Cite AI-generated material to ensure transparency.披露要求Disclosure

Following these principles supports fairness and respect in academia.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • 将课堂 AI 边界写在任务说明,并要求学生在使用前确认、在使用后说明用途;练习对 AI 内容核实,不能把引用视作任何用途的豁免。