Princeton University普林斯顿大学
ai.policy.nestudy.cn/Princeton
选取标准：对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.
Publicly available generative AI tools lack the contractual protections required by the University.
↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source
每项附该校原文中的依据语句，以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深，规定越明确、越具约束力（不代表优劣）；斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.
作业未说明可否使用 AI 时，适用何种规则？When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent
任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定？Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 7 所同样未作表述7 of 52 are likewise silent
是否设有分级的使用许可框架？Is there a graduated permission framework?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent
使用 AI 是否须予披露？为强制还是建议？Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?
The department states that students using any AI/LLM in any manner related to data must submit a separate statement specifying the program used, its application, and rationale.
编码说明CODING NOTEAnthropology Independent Work requires a separate statement naming the program used, its application, and rationale; no university-wide duty is stated.
52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)
是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史？Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent
AI 输出有误或虚构引注时，由谁负责？Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 14 所同样未作表述14 of 52 are likewise silent
违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性？How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 8 所同样未作表述8 of 52 are likewise silent
AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据？Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent
哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具？What must not be entered into an AI tool?
University-licensed generative AI tools should be used with Princeton Information classified as Unrestricted Within Princeton or Confidential under the University’s Information Security Policy. The use of publicly available generative AI tools in conjunction with such Princeton Information is not permitted
编码说明CODING NOTEPublic AI tools are barred for Princeton Information classified Unrestricted Within Princeton or Confidential; academic and research use is excluded.
52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：禁止上传受限数据（20/31）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)
是否规定版权及他人材料的使用？Does it regulate the use of copyrighted and others' material?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 27 所同样未作表述27 of 52 are likewise silent
学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具？Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?
only generative AI tools licensed by the University should be used with University Information classified as Unrestricted Within Princeton or Confidential information under the University’s Information Security Policy
编码说明CODING NOTEOnly University-licensed generative AI tools are designated for covered University Information; no named list of approved tools appears.
52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：提供机构版工具（19/24）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)
规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据？Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 15 所同样未作表述15 of 52 are likewise silent
该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述，以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文，中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料，不是宽严等级；未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.
招生院长的 2026 与 2025 官方博客明确劝申请人不要依赖生成想法或代写文书的 AI，并强调本人作品的申请承诺；属于官方劝告，不能改写成细分用途的统一禁止政策。
52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →undergraduate-advice-aiofficial-advicefull-text; accessed 2026-09-24[S1-Q1] advice against idea/composition generation
Newer on the scene are tools that allow for the generation of ideas and actual composition of papers and essays. While it might be tempting to rely on these types of aides, here’s my two cents about why you should shy away from them when preparing your college essays.
[S1-Q2] authenticity rationale
First and foremost, nothing generated by an AI tool will be as authentic and compelling as something you compose all on your own.
official-advicefull-text; accessed 2026-09-24[S2-Q1] application AI caution
AI is not inherently “bad”, but I caution against it in your college application.
[S2-Q2] application authorship attestation
Also, you are asked to sign off on your application verifying that the work is yours alone.
以下为研究者解读，不是校方原文；不把一般真实性期待写成未发布的 AI 规则。
Live targeted searches on 2026-09-24; secondary results were used only to locate official evidence.
site.admission.princeton.edu artificial intelligence AI application essayssite.admission.princeton.edu "AI" "essays" "Richardson"site.admission.princeton.edu essays AI application authenticity policyNo admissions office was contacted. No private application account or anti-bot bypass was used.
本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮，句末标签注明对应条款，点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.
The purpose of this policy is to manage the use of Princeton University administrative and operational information with generative AI tools.
In order to support the responsible use of generative AI tools and to mitigate the risks and limitations associated with their use, only generative AI tools licensed by the University should be used with University Information classified as Unrestricted Within Princeton or Confidential information under the University’s Information Security Policy机构工具Institutional tools. Publicly available generative AI tools lack the contractual protections required by the University.摘录Excerpt
This policy applies to all individuals and entities granted access to University Information, including, but not limited to, employees, contractors, temporary employees, and volunteers. For the purposes of this policy, University Information does not include information used for research, academic or instructional purposes.
University-licensed generative AI tools should be used with Princeton Information classified as Unrestricted Within Princeton or Confidential under the University’s Information Security Policy. The use of publicly available generative AI tools in conjunction with such Princeton Information is not permitted数据与隐私Data & privacy by the University.
Princeton's AI disclosure policy aligns with broader conventions about AI and authorship in academic publishing. AI tools do not meet the criteria for authorship for many publishers, and many prohibit the use of AI-generated sources and images. Many publishers provide guidelines and approved usage of AI, as well as guidance for when/how to disclose its use. If this information is not available for a specific publisher, authors and reviewers should reach out to the publisher or editor to confirm their expectations for the use of AI.
Publishers emphasize that authors are accountable for their submitted work, so it is important to review publisher policies for changes for each project or review you submit.
The department states that students using any AI/LLM in any manner related to data must submit a separate statement specifying the program used, its application, and rationale.披露要求Disclosure It also prohibits uses that violate IRB requirements or ethnographic research ethics concerning confidentiality.
以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点，非该校原文，不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.