Vassar College瓦萨学院
ai.policy.nestudy.cn/Vassar
选取标准：对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.
Verify claims; whenever possible, go to the source!
↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source
每项附该校原文中的依据语句，以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深，规定越明确、越具约束力（不代表优劣）；斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.
作业未说明可否使用 AI 时，适用何种规则？When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?
If you have questions about it, or there isn't a policy, talk to your professor
编码说明CODING NOTENo institutional default; if a course states no policy, students are directed to ask the professor.
52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：默认禁止（19/45）14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)
任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定？Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?
Vassar College does not have an official policy on generative AI but rather empowers Vassar faculty members and departments to make tailored policies about AI for their courses;
编码说明CODING NOTENo institution-wide AI policy; faculty and departments set their own tailored, course-specific rules.
52 校中 12 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：教师可定但有底线（33/45）12 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)
是否设有分级的使用许可框架？Is there a graduated permission framework?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 32 所同样未作表述32 of 52 are likewise silent
使用 AI 是否须予披露？为强制还是建议？Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?
If you use generative AI, make sure to disclose your use of AI.
编码说明CODING NOTEStates an unconditional directive to disclose any generative AI use.
52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：强制披露（20/46）20 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)
是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史？Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent
AI 输出有误或虚构引注时，由谁负责？Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?
Verify claims; whenever possible, go to the source!
编码说明CODING NOTEExplicit imperative duty to verify AI claims against original sources.
52 校中 17 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：须自行核实（17/38）17 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)
违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性？How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?
what's permissible in one class might constitute a violation of the Academic Integrity policy in another class
编码说明CODING NOTEFrames impermissible AI use in a given course as a violation of the Academic Integrity policy.
52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：学术不端（28/44）28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)
AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据？Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent
哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具？What must not be entered into an AI tool?
Many AI platforms collect user data and chats to further train their models.
编码说明CODING NOTECautions that AI platforms harvest data/chats and that free accounts may lack privacy protection.
52 校中 9 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：禁止上传受限数据（20/31）9 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)
是否规定版权及他人材料的使用？Does it regulate the use of copyrighted and others' material?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 27 所同样未作表述27 of 52 are likewise silent
学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具？Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?
As part of our campus Google suite, interactions with Gemini through your Vassar account are not shared outside of the college.
编码说明CODING NOTEGemini is offered through Vassar's campus Google suite as an account-linked, safer option.
52 校中 19 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径：提供机构版工具（19/24）19 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)
规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据？Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?
本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述；这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.
52 校中 15 所同样未作表述15 of 52 are likewise silent
该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述，以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文，中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料，不是宽严等级；未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.
已核验Vassar官方本科申请入口及评估因素；提及作文体现申请者个人优势，但没有发现能核验的招生AI专门用法规则。不可据此断言允许。
52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →no-verified-guidance. This is a classification of verified evidence, not a permission rating.first-year/transfer application / official-undergraduate-admissions-information2026-09-26T02:18:48.138761+00:00 (UTC)[S1-Q1] English original (verbatim excerpt)
Personal strengths, motivation, and potential as evidenced in essays, recommendations, and community involvement
site:vassar.edu/admission "AI" essay — Tavily quota 432; Google returned no extractable hits, Bing RSS returned irrelevant/off-domain hits; official admissions page saved and checked, AI-specific rule not verified. Search failure is not evidence of no rule.site:vassar.edu/admission essay authentic own voice — Tavily quota 432; Google returned no extractable hits, Bing RSS returned irrelevant/off-domain hits; official admissions page saved and checked, AI-specific rule not verified. Search failure is not evidence of no rule.site:vassar.edu/admission ChatGPT generative artificial intelligence — Tavily quota 432; Google returned no extractable hits, Bing RSS returned irrelevant/off-domain hits; official admissions page saved and checked, AI-specific rule not verified. Search failure is not evidence of no rule.本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮，句末标签注明对应条款，点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.
Resources and questions to consider related to using generative AI for research
This guide is designed to support Vassar community members as they navigate decisions about their use of generative AI, while recognizing that this topic, and our understanding of it, is rapidly evolving.
Vassar College does not have an official policy on generative AI but rather empowers Vassar faculty members and departments to make tailored policies about AI for their courses;课程规则优先Instructor override
what's permissible in one class might constitute a violation of the Academic Integrity policy in another class违规定性Integrity framing
.
As you make decisions about using AI for academic work:
Check the syllabus and course page on Moodle to familiarize yourself with the course AI policy.
If you have questions about it, or there isn't a policy, talk to your professor默认规则Default rule
.
If you use generative AI, make sure to disclose your use of AI.披露要求Disclosure
This might look like citing it as a source, describing how you used it in the Methods section of your paper, or something else!
It's crucial that you are transparent about how you're using AI
.
Critically evaluate the outputs of AI tools
.
Verify claims; whenever possible, go to the source!摘录Excerpt核实责任Verification duty
Stay informed about the ethical concerns surrounding generative AI so that you can make an informed decision about whether to use it.
A living document, updated regularly as new products enter the market or new information about existing products becomes available; maintained by Ithaka S+R, a non-profit organization focused on helping academic and cultural communities navigate economic, technological, and demographic change.
An evaluation tool that that prompts users to consider questions related to a tool's reliability, objective, bias, ownership, type. Developed by librarians at McGill University.
Guidance for determining if your sources are be reliable or relevant. If you use AI tools to search for sources, verify that they are legitimate and that they are right for your research.
Many AI platforms collect user data and chats to further train their models.数据与隐私Data & privacy Check your account settings to see if you can opt out of data collection and training.
If you are using a free account, you may have little to no privacy and data protection.
Gemini is considered a safer AI tool. As part of our campus Google suite, interactions with Gemini through your Vassar account are not shared outside of the college.机构工具Institutional tools Note, chats with Gemini with your Vassar account cannot be deleted.
以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点，非该校原文，不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.