← 政策图谱Atlas 申请环节Admissions 学生规范Guidelines
No.13 / 52 · 52 所大学 AI 使用政策比较研究No.13 of 52 · AI Use Policies at 52 Universities

Johns Hopkins

Johns Hopkins University约翰斯·霍普金斯大学

来源层级 · 混合来源Source level · Mixed 10 / 12 项有明文规定10 of 12 provisions addressed 采集于 2026-08-21Accessed 2026-08-21 申请环节 · 本科 AI 明文边界Admissions · Explicit undergraduate rules

原文摘录Excerpt

选取标准:对高中读者最具引用价值的一句原文。Selected as the sentence most quotable for a high-school reader.

GenAI may be used in limited ways to support learning, but not to replace original thinking.

↓ 在原文中的位置↓ Where it appears in the source

十二项条款The twelve provisions

10 / 12

每项附该校原文中的依据语句,以及图谱 52 校中持同一立场的校数。颜色越深,规定越明确、越具约束力(不代表优劣);斜纹表示该来源未作表述。Each provision gives the supporting sentence and how many of the 52 universities in the atlas take the same position. Darker means more explicit and binding (not better); hatching means the source does not address it.

许可Permission使用许可由谁决定who decides whether AI may be used

默认规则Default rule

Default rule默认规则

作业未说明可否使用 AI 时,适用何种规则?When an assignment says nothing about AI, what applies?

交由教师决定Instructor decides, no default
The use of GenAI is subject to existing university policies. Students should consult instructors before using GenAI in coursework.

编码说明CODING NOTENo stated fallback for silent assignments; students are routed to the instructor, and only with "should" — a recommendation, not a rule.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:默认禁止(19/45)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Prohibited by default (19/45)

课程规则优先Instructor override

Instructor override课程规则优先

任课教师的规定是否优先于校级规定?Does an instructor's rule take precedence over the institution's?

教师可定但有底线Instructor rules within limits主流口径MOST COMMON
Students still remain responsible for what they submit and must follow the instructions attached to the course or assignment.

编码说明CODING NOTECourse/assignment instructions set the permission level, while responsibility for what is submitted still remains with the student.

52 校中 33 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:教师可定但有底线(33/45)33 of 52 take this position · most common: Instructor rules within limits (33/45)

分级许可Tiered scale

Tiered scale分级许可

是否设有分级的使用许可框架?Is there a graduated permission framework?

明确分级框架Explicit named scale
Green: Liberal GenAI use is permitted, with expectations for transparency and accountability

编码说明CODING NOTEA three-level red/yellow/green permission framework, published by Engineering for Professionals rather than university-wide.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:非正式分类(15/20)5 of 52 take this position · most common: Informal categories (15/20)

透明Transparency使用后须说明的内容what must be declared after use

披露要求Disclosure

Disclosure披露要求

使用 AI 是否须予披露?为强制还是建议?Must AI use be disclosed, and is that required or recommended?

依课程而定Course dependent
GenAI may be used in limited ways to support learning, but not to replace original thinking. All GenAI use must be disclosed according to course expectations.

编码说明CODING NOTEDisclosure is mandatory within the yellow tier but its form is defined by course expectations; no general institution-wide disclosure rule is stated.

52 校中 14 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:强制披露(20/46)14 of 52 take this position · most common: Required (20/46)

过程留证Process evidence

Process evidence过程留证

是否须保留草稿、提示词或编辑历史?Must drafts, prompts or edit history be kept?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 33 所同样未作表述33 of 52 are likewise silent

责任Accountability错误与违规的责任归属responsibility for errors and violations

核实责任Verification duty

Verification duty核实责任

AI 输出有误或虚构引注时,由谁负责?Who is responsible when AI output is wrong or a citation is invented?

学生对成品完全负责Student fully responsible
You are responsible for any AI-generated content that you produce or publish. AI outputs can be inaccurate and misleading, may contain copyrighted material, or may be entirely fabricated. Always review and verify content before sharing it.

编码说明CODING NOTEFull accountability for AI-generated content plus an explicit duty to review and verify before sharing.

52 校中 10 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:须自行核实(17/38)10 of 52 take this position · most common: Verification required (17/38)

违规定性Integrity framing

Integrity framing违规定性

违规使用在纪律体系中如何定性?How is a violation classified in the disciplinary system?

学术不端Academic integrity violation主流口径MOST COMMON
Students must complete all work independently without GenAI assistance, including drafting, editing, or revision, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Use of GenAI in this category constitutes a violation of academic integrity.

编码说明CODING NOTEStated for the red tier specifically; plagiarism is not the term used.

52 校中 28 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:学术不端(28/44)28 of 52 take this position · most common: Academic integrity violation (28/44)

检测器证据Detector evidence

Detector evidence检测器证据

AI 检测工具的结果能否作为证据?Can AI-detection results be used as evidence?

未作表述Not addressed

本项目采集的官方来源未就此条款作出表述;这不代表该校没有相关规定。The official source collected here does not address this provision; this does not mean the university has no rule on it.

52 校中 38 所同样未作表述38 of 52 are likewise silent

边界Boundaries数据、版权与工具的限制limits on data, copyright and tools

数据与隐私Data & privacy

Data & privacy数据与隐私

哪些内容不得输入 AI 工具?What must not be entered into an AI tool?

禁止上传受限数据Restricted data prohibited主流口径MOST COMMON
Do not enter proprietary JHU data—including clinical, financial, or business records—into third-party, unapproved GenAI tools. These tools do not guarantee privacy, and sharing proprietary or sensitive data with unauthorized parties violates university policy.

编码说明CODING NOTENamed categories (clinical, financial, business, confidential/sensitive) are barred from unapproved tools as a policy violation.

52 校中 20 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:禁止上传受限数据(20/31)20 of 52 take this position · most common: Restricted data prohibited (20/31)

机构工具Institutional tools

Institutional tools机构工具

学校是否指定或提供 AI 工具?Does the institution designate or provide AI tools?

批准工具清单Approved tool list
Start with approved GenAI tools and connect with JHU IT before procuring new ones. The university is working to ensure that AI tools procured on behalf of JHU meet its privacy and security standards.

编码说明CODING NOTERefers to a category of university-approved tools and platforms; no specific tool or enterprise tier is named in the file.

52 校中 5 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:提供机构版工具(19/24)5 of 52 take this position · most common: Institution-provided tool (19/24)

理由Rationale规则的依据the stated basis for the rules

学习理由Learning rationale

Learning rationale学习理由

规则是否以“不得绕过应习得的能力”为依据?Are the rules grounded in not bypassing the skills to be learned?

明确以学习目标为据Explicit learning-objective rationale主流口径MOST COMMON
GenAI may be used in limited ways to support learning, but not to replace original thinking.

编码说明CODING NOTEThe yellow tier states AI may support learning but must not replace the original thinking, tying permission to the thinking being assessed.

52 校中 22 所与此相同 · 该条主流口径:明确以学习目标为据(22/37)22 of 52 take this position · most common: Explicit learning-objective rationale (22/37)

补充信息Further detail

该校的分级框架Its permission levels

  1. Red: GenAI may not be used in any form
  2. Yellow: Moderate GenAI use is permitted, with restrictions
  3. Green: Liberal GenAI use is permitted, with expectations for transparency and accountability

要求披露的内容What must be disclosed

使用范围与程度Extent of use

申请环节的 AI 政策AI in the application

admissions/13-Johns-Hopkins.md

该校招生办公室就申请人使用 AI 的公开表述,以本科新生申请为主。英文为逐字原文,中文为整理者的分析。证据状态描述找到了什么材料,不是宽严等级;未说明不代表允许。What this university's admissions office says about applicants using AI, chiefly for first-year undergraduate applications. English passages are verbatim; the Chinese is the collector's analysis. The evidence status describes what material was found, not how strict the rules are; silence does not mean permission.

证据状态Evidence status 本科申请 AI 明文边界(效力见来源)Explicit AI boundaries for undergraduate applicants (force as stated in the source)

本科招生 FAQ 明确允许写作开始前用 AI 构思/细化想法,以及对本人文字做拼写、语法等基础校对;申请材料必须原创,提交 AI 实质内容被列为申请欺诈。

52 所大学对照 →All 52 compared →

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-09-24 (Asia/Shanghai)
  • 格式说明Format note Short English excerpts from live official webpages/PDFs; whitespace and layout normalized, wording retained. Chinese findings are editorial interpretation, not official quotations. Local text snapshots retain provenance; unavailable pages are explicitly marked.
  • 适用范围Scope note Undergraduate application materials, including written essays and activity lists; graduate admissions and classroom policies are not imported.
  • 证据状态Evidence status explicit-undergraduate-ai — verified undergraduate admissions policy.
  • 相关校内/课程指导(范围不同)Related university/course guidance (different scope) Original file

中文结论(解读,非原文)

  • 已核验本科申请者 AI 明确规则,而非将教学政策套用到招生。[S1]
  • 可在写作开始前用 AI 做 brainstorming / refining ideas;可对自己已写的内容做拼写、语法等基础校对。[S1-Q1]
  • 提交的所有材料必须是本人原创;提交 AI 的实质性内容或输出不被允许,并按其采用的 Common Application 政策视为申请欺诈。[S1-Q1][S1-Q2]
  • FAQ 所载真实性承诺列举可能的撤销录取等处分;不是关于检测器分数或自动处罚的规定。[S1-Q3]

Official sources and exact excerpts

[S1] Frequently Asked Questions | Johns Hopkins University Admissions

  • 发布单位Publishing unit Johns Hopkins University — Office of Undergraduate Admissions
  • 链接URL https://apply.jhu.edu/frequently-asked-questions/
  • 页面日期Page date Not stated on the retrieved page.
  • 适用对象Audience / scope undergraduate
  • 来源性质Authority policy
  • 采集时间Retrieved full-text; 2026-09-24T23:04:34+08:00
  • 范围与核验说明Scope / verification note Undergraduate admissions FAQ, Applications & Requirements. The page expressly states Hopkins policy and adopts Common Application affirmations; it is not a coursework rule.

[S1-Q1] Allowed preparatory help and proofreading; original work requirement

It is Hopkins’ policy that you may use AI tools for brainstorming or refining ideas before the writing process begins and for basic proofreading of your own writing, such as spelling and grammar review, but all material submitted within the application must be your own original work.

[S1-Q2] Substantive AI output is impermissible application fraud

Submitting “the substantive content or output of an artificial intelligence platform, technology, or algorithm” is not permissible and is considered an instance of application fraud in accordance with Common Application policies.

[S1-Q3] Consequences in the affirmation reproduced by Hopkins

I understand that I may be subject to a range of possible disciplinary actions, including admission revocation, expulsion, or revocation of course credit, grades, and degree should the information I have certified be false.

使用边界(中文解读,不是学校原话)

  • 明确允许(附条件):写前构思、写前细化思路;对本人写作进行基础拼写/语法检查。[S1-Q1]
  • 明确不允许:提交 AI 实质内容或输出;以他人或 AI 内容冒充本人原创。[S1-Q2]
  • 未单独说明:AI 翻译、写后结构重写、研究补充材料中的具体 AI 操作、统一披露或保存聊天记录要求。不能把基础校对许可扩大解释。

限制与未说明事项

  • 网页未标明 AI 条款发布日期;访问日不是生效日。
  • 明确许可中的构思/细化想法限于写作开始前,基础校对限于本人文字;不得扩大为任意重写或代写。
  • 未单列 AI 翻译、研究补充材料、图片/作品集、披露格式或提示词留存要求;通用原创要求仍适用于提交材料。
  • 原文列出的撤销录取、开除、撤销学分/成绩/学位来自其采用的真实性承诺,表述为可能后果,不是每次 AI 使用都会自动触发。
检索记录(2026-09-24)
  • site.apply.jhu.edu application artificial intelligence essays AI admissions — 广义定向检索定位本科 FAQ;首个查询的域名限定语法较宽,随后用正确 site: 语法复核。
  • site:apply.jhu.edu "AI" "proofreading" — 定位 FAQ 明确 AI 条款;普通 HTTP 完整抓取核验,不能沿用旧的“无官方政策”二手说法。
  • site:apply.jhu.edu application essays artificial intelligence admissions — 第二条使用正确 site: 限定的不同检索再次定位本科 FAQ;课程介绍和学生范文命中不作为申请规则。
  • Direct review: https://apply.jhu.edu/frequently-asked-questions/ — 检查 Applications & Requirements / AI 问答及其本人作品真实性承诺;源码中的折叠问答已提取。

本页仅报告上述范围内已核验的材料;未找到、未明确说明或抓取失败均不等于允许使用 AI。课程/在校生政策不自动适用于申请者。

官方原文The official text

univ/13-Johns-Hopkins.md

本项目采集的该校官方文本。图谱引用的语句已高亮,句末标签注明对应条款,点击可返回该条款。The official text collected for this university. Sentences the atlas cites are highlighted; the tag after each names the provision it supports and links back to it.

来源信息Source information

  • 访问日期Accessed 2026-08-21
  • 格式说明Format note Direct excerpts and clearly scoped summaries from official Johns Hopkins webpages; navigation and site chrome removed. Directly quoted wording is retained.
  • 适用范围Scope note The student-facing red/yellow/green framework is published by Johns Hopkins Engineering for Professionals (EP). The responsible-use guidance is enterprise-wide. EP’s framework is not represented here as a single university-wide coursework policy.
  • 用途说明Use note This is source material for comparison, not a translation or the school’s final high-school policy.

Student Guidance on Responsible Generative AI Use


As in all scholarly work, students are expected to present their learning and ideas as their own. Graduate studies provide the opportunity to deepen field-specific understanding and apply critical thinking and knowledge in academic and professional settings.

Red: GenAI may not be used in any form

Students must complete all work independently without GenAI assistance, including drafting, editing, or revision, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Use of GenAI in this category constitutes a violation of academic integrity.违规定性Integrity framing

Yellow: Moderate GenAI use is permitted, with restrictions

GenAI may be used in limited ways to support learning, but not to replace original thinking.学习理由Learning rationale摘录Excerpt All GenAI use must be disclosed according to course expectations.披露要求Disclosure

Green: Liberal GenAI use is permitted, with expectations for transparency and accountability分级许可Tiered scale

The green category allows broader use while retaining expectations for transparency and accountability. Students still remain responsible for what they submit and must follow the instructions attached to the course or assignment.课程规则优先Instructor override

Enterprise-wide Guidelines for Responsible Use of AI


IT@JH’s enterprisewide Guidelines for Responsible Use of AI outline how to ensure these technologies are used safely, ethically, and in compliance with existing policies. Of note:

  • Start with approved GenAI tools and connect with JHU IT before procuring new ones. The university is working to ensure that AI tools procured on behalf of JHU meet its privacy and security standards.机构工具Institutional tools
  • Protect confidential data. Do not enter proprietary JHU data—including clinical, financial, or business records—into third-party, unapproved GenAI tools. These tools do not guarantee privacy, and sharing proprietary or sensitive data with unauthorized parties violates university policy.数据与隐私Data & privacy
  • You are responsible for any AI-generated content that you produce or publish. AI outputs can be inaccurate and misleading, may contain copyrighted material, or may be entirely fabricated. Always review and verify content before sharing it.核实责任Verification duty
  • Adhere to current university policies. The use of GenAI is subject to existing university policies. Students should consult instructors before using GenAI in coursework.默认规则Default rule

When engaging with third-party GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, it is important to consider information security and data privacy, compliance, copyright, and academic integrity.知识产权IP & copyright

Because GenAI learns by collecting, analyzing, and storing user-provided information, university faculty, staff, and students should never enter confidential information or sensitive data into any GenAI tools that have not been approved by the university. Sensitive material must be handled through the university’s approved platforms and within university policy and guidance.

以下为整理者所写的高中适用要点,非该校原文,不作为任何条款的依据。Below: the collector’s notes on application to high school — not the university’s text, and not used as evidence for any provision.

High-school adaptation takeaways

  • A red/yellow/green label on every assignment can make permission levels immediately understandable.
  • Even “green” use still requires accountability; permission is not a transfer of authorship.
  • AI may support learning but should not replace the original thinking being assessed.
  • Students should use approved platforms, protect sensitive data, verify outputs, and ask the teacher before uncertain use.